Feedback talk:User/Talamare/Bull's Charge

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Nice, can now be used as anti-kite and general KD without stopping you from dealing damage; IDK if this is overpowered cause I don't use KD warriors too much but just wanted to point that fact out. Also, I like the way you make it fit with the name. Rypofalem 01:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Does this description mean that the user needs to strike in melee or that the target can do whatever he or she wants but not activating melee attack skills? It seems that it is quite ambiguously written. Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 03:08, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
To me it seems like you have to strike someone in melee.
Also, I think this would see about as much play as Charging Strike, which is to say not that much. Vili 点 User talk:Vili 03:17, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
slightly reword it make it more clear, you just need to melee(attacks and attacks skills both count) someone whos not using skills... added 3 more ideas -Talamare- feedback 11:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Quite lame skill this is just rush + bulls or Enraging charge + bulls without + dmg. Coward is so much better elite. Raemon 21:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Bull's charge is fine, and it does see the occasional play. WubVII
User NuclearVII signature 3.jpg
User NuclearVII sigheart.png
23:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Bull's Charge is so weak it's kind of amusing, because it's elite. Charging Strike, "Coward!", and "You're All Alone!" are better skills.~>Sins WDBUser The Sins We Die By Sig.png 04:38, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Except that Charging Strike is never used, and Bull's is. I agree that coward and YAA are better choices, but that doesn't necessarily speak to BS's underpoweredness. WubVII
User NuclearVII signature 3.jpg
User NuclearVII sigheart.png
13:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)