Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/DrogoBoffin

Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions.

DrogoBoffin

This request is for the sysophood of DrogoBoffin (talk • contribs • logs • block log).
Created by Drogo Boffin 00:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC).

Status

Withdrawn 18:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Candidate statement

I have been on the wiki for a good while now. I only want what is good for this wiki. I can help the wiki with my ability to stay completely unbiased. I have no sysop experience on this wiki or pvx. I have been an admin on multiple large forums and large vent servers. I already patrol the rc and I am even willing to stay out of user interaction if I am asked to (all but the typical vandals). I know this is the same thing that everybody else says but I think that if I had access to the sysop tools I could be more productive. With the tools I could better help with enforcing policy. I am not looking to use the tools first and ask later. I hope to resolve situations without having to use the tools. I am not looking to replace any sysops I simply want to join the team and do whatever I can with them to improve and keep the wiki going vandal/drama free. With only one sysop listed as active and only seeing the sysops a couple times a day at most, I feel the wiki needs somebody that is going to show up more in the rc and remain with this wiki. I do not plan on getting GW2 and will keep playing GW until they shut it down. I do have a GW2W account and seeing as I dont plan on getting GW2, I wont be doing much editing there. I am not looking for power, I just feel this wiki needs somebody who isnt going to be going to the new wiki to stay around and keep it calm and running smoothly. Drogo Boffin 22:34, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Support

1. ...

Oppose

1. While I'm sure you mean well, I'll predict right now that any added convenience of having another "body" on the admin list would be far outweighed by the time needed to review and undo actions carried out either through carelessness or misunderstanding. Forgive my bluntness, but you have neither the wisdom nor the maturity for the job. A sysop with unreliable judgment is worse than no sysop at all. - Tanetris 19:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
2. Has a history of escalating problems, even simple vandal issues. Stuff like User talk:69.112.250.55 isn't conducive to effective administration (User talk:DrogoBoffin/Archive#This). Quick-archives everything on his talk page, even warnings about personal attacks (to which he responds with personal attacks) and requests not to quick-archive. May be inclined to use CheckUser improperly. pling 15:18, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Neutral. I personally haven't seen a lot from you, but that is due to my own inactivity. That said, I can't warrant either a support or opposition vote, but if DrogoBoffin is committed to GWW in a time when most have receded from the game over time, then give Drogo a shot at adminship. Active on the site & commitment are both great things that will amount to good for the site when put forward in the right effort. — ク Eloc 貢 00:59, 21 April 2012 (UTC)