Guild Wars Wiki talk:Arbitration committee/2010-02-08-User:Misery

Explanation of my actions

Would anyone actually like one? Misery 21:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes. --92.3.45.23 22:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

"Passing off my nomination as vandalism is just petty suppression and an abuse of admin rights." – even if it was an abuse, this would be the wrong location to complain about it. poke | talk 22:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

You are right poke, here is my RfA if you would like to request reconfirmation of my adminship status on the basis of an alledged abuse of power. Misery 22:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Any RfA would likely drag out longer than the nomination phase of the elections, thus rendering Misery's obvious attempt at disenfranchising me successful. Kurz Hates Challenge 23:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Arbcomm usually takes even longer. Just saying. Misery 23:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

You could just recreate the nomination. elix Omni 23:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

The nomination is rather out of the blue and I can see where Misery might think it is vandalism. Droks has not contributed in two and half years with 23 contributions over a one day timespan. In particular, 12 going to user talk pages, 2 to his user page, and 1 going to the admin noticeboard when he was banned. If it is a valid nomination, as Felix said above, just recreate it. — Gares 23:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)