Guild Wars Wiki talk:Elections/2009-08 bureaucrat election

For the records, again I'm against bureaucrats as they currently exist. I would rather have bureaucrats as sysops who can change user rights and allow sysops to make committees than to have these elections. Erasculio 00:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Guild Wars Wiki:Adminship; this is what you want to change, this has nothing to do with the election. poke | talk 00:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Given how this is an election for bureaucrats, rather obviously it has something to do with the election. I don't plan to have (or rather, repeat) that discussion here, just to express how I'm against these elections. Erasculio 00:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

And how is that going to have an effect on this election? — Jon Lupen 00:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

The election is going via the election policy which is based on the Adminship policy. You can say it wherever and as often as you want, but nothings gonna change as long as the adminship policy stays like this. poke | talk 00:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

And thus, if I can say it wherever I want, here I am saying it. Good enough for you? Erasculio 00:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, if you don't stand to gain anything, why bother? — Jon Lupen 00:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

... are we really doing this? Come on, guys. -- Brains12 \ talk 00:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Doing what specifically? If that would be asking rhetorical questions, than the answer is no. — Jon Lupen 00:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Rhetorical questions don't have answers. Titani Ertan 00:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

*facepalms* I think you missed my point... — Jon Lupen 00:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I think you/we all missed the point. Titani Ertan 00:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Policy changes go on the policy discussion board. Discussion about this bureaucrat election goes here. Lets keep it that way. -- Wandering Traveler 00:58, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Boring election is boring. Karate Jesus. . . *giggle* ~Shard 08:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Needs moar wiki drama and Misery. Titani Ertan {{Snappy the Turtle}} 11:41, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

There are still only 3 applications. Anyone got any more nominees? --Burning Freebies 13:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

On second thoughts, i just changed the election status to its correct status. Good luck candidates!--Burning Freebies 13:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for changing it :) poke | talk 14:07, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Can the main banner declaring the election status only be changed by sysops?--Burning Freebies 21:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

The sitenotice can only be changed by sysops, yes. – Emmett 21:43, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Not much drama in this election, on this talk page or on any of the candidate pages.... GW wiki has gone boring, think I'm going back to watching Mexican soaps. 89.172.35.101 06:08, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Its over?

Tanetris: +46
Defiant Elements: +28
Karate Jesus: -20
Tanetris wins :) Congratz Tane. --SilentStorm 01:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm too lazy to browse. Is that the highest ever positive vote count? Vili 点 03:00, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it is. A new record! Vili 点 04:00, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Updated page with results. -- Lacky 06:30, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

So grats to the old and new bureaucrat. --Xeeron 13:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

So Karate Jesus won? :o Moo Kitty 14:34, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

No, Tanetris did. -- Lacky 05:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

lol... poke | talk 10:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Should congrat DE too for extending his record. Backsword 10:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)