Tell Scarlet I do give a damn.
Failures of Communication
First one to remove my Thanksgiving message gets a pressie. GOGOGO Titani Ertan 13:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Wait, what?--Unendingfear 19x19px 13:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Better? Titani Ertan 13:36, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- I don't get what you're asking :/--Unendingfear 19x19px 13:36, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- There's a Thanksgiving message. Remove it first to get a prize. Titani Ertan 13:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- I win, 100e please. ~Celestia 13:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) CONGRATULATIONS!!! You win. I'll give you your prize in a sec. edit: Unending.... Titani Ertan 13:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- You mean archive the crane or something?--Unendingfear 19x19px 13:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- For that comment alone, I think Unending should win... ~Celestia 13:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- J.P.Talk 16:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- 's c00l. n u? Titani Ertan 16:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
"Now, the Protestants are something special; they swipe away how the Church used/uses fear to "express" religion, and take the Jewish method: religion through the faith in God, not the fear of "Do this or go to Hell"."
This is funny because all fundamentalists are Protestant. Ever heard of Puritans, Baptists, Jehovah's Witnesses, etc etc? They're the ones shouting "FAGS BURN IN HELL" and "GO TO HELL BABY-KILLER." Apparently you need some theology classes or something, because the Catholic precept of salvation through faith and good deeds is liberating rather than confining. It means that even if people don't believe in God (or don't practice their faith regularly), they can still attain salvation through living good lives. Martin Luther only felt the need to redefine salvation because he was mentally unstable and went to confession five times a day. elix Omni 20:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- It runs both ways ;o--Unendingfear 19x19px 20:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- OH NO THE PLAGUE OF RELIGIOUS DEBATE IS SPREADING
- btw felix omni is closer to the truth but btw jehovah's witnesses are not a denomination of Christianity
- and rereading, felix's comment about Luther is depressingly ad hominem; "of course everything the catholic church did was right; luther only thought otherwise due to a (very sketchy) mental illness" | 72 (UTC) 21:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Can you people please shut it? I have never read anything involving religion on a forum/chat/bulletin board that did not end in a flamewar. Let's not risk anything. Koda Kumi 21:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Flame wars are fun though D:--Unendingfear 19x19px 21:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- We all have different views in religion. -- riyen ♥ 22:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- And yet not in basic adages. Aw, stuff brings us together! | 72 (UTC) 22:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Jehovah's Witnesses are most certainly Christian. Martin Luther was unable to find spiritual comfort in the Catholic Church , so he made a religion where he could be comfortable. There's nothing wrong with that. elix Omni 23:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh! My second time being wrong in so short a time! We were raised to see the Witnesses' version as far from our own that they were different altogether (much like the Muslims are different though they share the first 50-60% of the history). Though I don't think your research on Luther is very objective; not only is it evidence totally unfamiliar to my ears, it sounds awfully speculative/explanatory. A good read on him is "Interpreting Martin Luther" by Victor Shepherd, it's pretty new. Anyway, sorry Titani for clogging your talk page with inane banter :D | 72 (UTC) 02:07, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- k Titani Ertan 05:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- I wasn't trying to present that as objective research indicating Martin Luther was a nutcase, because he wasn't. It was just a blurb from my high school history textbook that I recall. Also, something I was mulling over last night:
- "the Jewish method: religion through the faith in God"
- Well this is just silly, as anyone who has studied Judaism or read the Old Testament would tell you. The utmost importance in Judaism is placed on practice and ritual, not faith. In fact, you could say the Jews take faith in God for granted. There are over 600 laws proscribed in the Torah, and good Orthodox Jews follow every one of them. elix Omni 17:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with you, and mostly used his definition to make my point. As I mentioned, the Pharisees were the heads of the Jewish religion at the time and the were the antithesis of his definition, as well as those whom you call Orthodox Jews (I assume you mean Hasidim and similar sects). However, Jesus' rebuke of them is an indication that it wasn't intended to be that way. Remember that most of the patriarchs lived before Jesus or Jewish law, and that "Abraham's faith was credited to him as righteousness"; the "intended" Jewish method by the Judeo-Christian God, which was tried again for Christianity (and came mostly to a similar end, as you noted in your first post on this page), was faith-salvation. It was a human failing that necessitated "letter of the law" rather than the "spirit behind law" approach. | 72 (UTC) 23:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Jesus Supports Sysop Discretion? Vili 点 00:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Late response, but not for lack of thought. I know that viewing Judaism through a Christian lens is the norm for modern Christians, but when I spoke of Orthodox Jews I meant modern practitioners of Judaism. In today's world there are essentially three branches of Judaism- Orthodox Jews, Conserative Jews, and Reformed Jews. The main difference among the three is how strictly they interpret the laws in the Torah. In a nutshell, Orthodox Jews follow the letter of the law, Conservative Jews follow the spirit of the law, and Reformed Jews follow their noses to the Froot Loop tree. (Actually, they believe most of the laws in the Torah are obsolete in today's society.) elix Omni 03:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Furst Reaper of Scythes Talk 22:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
...uh wut?... --Neil2250 16:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Something ive found about you.
he ses back on friday...but he still haz time to correct my Shat mistakes!!--Neil2250 16:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, but I still have interwrbz; I'm just generally too lazy to reply or comment on anything. Titani Ertan 16:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Proof for dividing by 0
I must admit I am puzzled by your explaination. I ask/request that you provide a formal mathematical proof for your argument. Thanks, Curin Derwin 07:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- To lazy to look: You can divide by 0 Titani? -- Lacky 07:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Lim(a/x) as x → 0- = —infinity
- Lim(a/x) as x → 0+ = +infinity
- wut? --RIDDLE 08:09, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) I will derive? -- Lacky 08:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- That's a wonderful answer for a Calculus exam/course. What I need though is a explaination of what that is essentially proving. Perhaps even a conclusion with the mentioning of some axiom or therom therein might suffice. This may help you formulate your proof. *EDIT* Forgot to sign. Also, lulz on the YouTube link. --Curin Derwin 08:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- If I knew how to prove that specific situation, I would. Titani Ertan 10:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Then don't worry about it! =D Do whatever you have to in order to prove your stance. =) --Curin Derwin 13:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Logically, I'm seeing how you are approaching it, but graphically, it doesn't make sense. --RIDDLE 16:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Look at it the other way around, then. Start by 0:5 and then try 5:0. Titani Ertan 16:55, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- If you are saying that a/0=infinity, like your main space shows, I think that you are simply using the definition of a limit to define your reponse. You need to show that, although I truly don't think it will solidify anything substantial. =\ --Curin Derwin 17:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, so you're assuming that Lim(a/x) as x → 0 exists. Graphically, it doesn't exist, since one side of the graph shoots downward forever as it gets to zero, and the other side shoots upward forever as it gets to zero. The only thing I can think of that fits your answer is that you take the distance of Lim(a/x) as x → 0- and Lim(a/x) as x → 0+, (Assuming that x will eventually hit zero from both sides, and the corresponding y's would be -infinity and +infinity) the answer will be infinity (Note: the lack of + or -). However, that is something else entirely. --RIDDLE 18:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, so the problem here isn't your logic; it's your notation.
- a/0 != infinity
- a/x as x → 0- & + = infinity
- Thus, unfortunately, proving absolutely nothing about dividing by 0. =\ Sorry m8.--Curin Derwin 06:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Only if you go live on a kibbutzim. Vili 点 19:04, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- 'Fraid not. Also, wow, so fast. Titani Ertan 19:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- Simon Le Bon worked on one of those as a kid. Wow I can relate him to everything!--*Yasmin Parvaneh* 21:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- One way or another, after checking in, "true" ones seem to be far and few, as so many were bought (or something like that). Anyway, I don't feel like being in a closed community with the average age of 51. Titani Ertan 20:07, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
If you haven't 100%'d KH and KH II by now, urdoingitwrong Ryuu - talk 21:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hey man, I haven't done that yet. But it's only because I hate Sony so I can't play anything that comes out on PlayStation. :] Vili 点 01:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- I finished them both when they were released (not Hardcore or Proud mode, though); 100% complete to the every last bit. Not long ago I rediscovered them in my cabinet, so I'm grinding atm (already finished KH I again, including getting Save the Queen and King and killingz Sephiroth :D [=which explains my sudden fuss about Sephiroth, which I defeated :D). At The World that Never Was, about halfway now, so gonna be doing Hardcore mode soon~ Titani Ertan 20:07, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
i realy want to know...
HOW MANY VERGINITY TOKENS DO YOU HAVE?!!?! u got kingdom hearts 358/2 days yet? im gettin it 4 christmas ^_^ --Neil2250 16:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- I bought 358/2 Days when it was released, but I'm waiting to finish previous KH ones before I begin it, to be storyline pro and all. Except KH: Memories... But KH: CoM I do own.
- The thing is, you can only have 1 virginity token. That's the problem about it, as once you give it away... it never returns. Titani Ertan 20:07, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- That depends. If you gave yours away, but two people gave you theirs (you slick dog!), then don't you have two? Even if they are not your own? --Curin Derwin 14:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- bark bark bark Titani Ertan 05:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Beaten Sephiroth yet? If so, regardless of difficulty, the final boss (x10) should be easy regardless of the difficulty level. If not, go level till you can. Oh, and fully level all your forms, including final form (glide = win). When you play as Riku in the rock-paper-scissors bit, only use "Dark Aura" or w/e the hell it's called. Anyway, hows things? Shadow Runner 17:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yep. And discovered that after waking up, in 8 AM or so. Didn't max any form (didn't even know there was a Final Form).
- Found something awesome to do: Fenrir+Berserkers Charge (around those lines)+Negative Combo+Finishing move damage boost. Every attack is a finisher. If the game wasn't retardedly easy before, it is now. But I miss Sephiroth. Titani Ertan 05:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Everyone knows it was Al Gore who created/invented the interwebz -- Lacky 06:07, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Newton invented gravity. True story. Titani Ertan 05:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
So you're also a KH fan
Epic! So am I! <3333. Dark Morphon 16:32, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- I re-completed it after reading your page. Now I remember why my friend told me to not have Session equipped on Riku. They're great games though. --neshot. 16:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- ^^ Titani Ertan 05:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
^ -- Lacky 22:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- Have a great one Titani ^__^
- Ho ho ho di yo ho, merry Christmas to you! Titani Ertan 05:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Nice addition to the page. :P Not to mention the fact that both of the Christian ones were stolen from Pagan (spell check please >.>) holidays xD--/u/nendingfear 19x19px 05:58, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Bro, I think you are having a hard time differentiating the commercialization of religious holidays and what they originally used to represent...how they are supposed to be celebrated. Why, just today I saw a bunch of people heading into a local church to observe Winter Mass. I think that's meaningful, don't you?
Either that or you are just trolling, in which case I'll give 5/10 because I let it get to me. Vili 点 06:53, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- >implying that judaism is any less of a cult than christianity
- hahahaha, your userpage is funny. -Auron 06:56, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- Many traditions were changed from what they were supposed to represent. Not just from Christianity, and not just in religion.
- Actually Auron, yeah, it is. My userpage wasn't intended to say so, but yeah, it is. Titani Ertan 11:56, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- To quote an american genius: "Even though one particular religion is sillier than yours, your religion is still silly." Yea, it does not matter if you believe in a talking snake or a bird on fire. If you believe in a fairy tale, making fun of other religions just makes you look dumb :P Koda Kumi 13:01, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- Most historians believe Jesus was born in September or something, but nobody knows the exact date. Christmas was originally a pagan holiday and got "Christianised" by the Vatican because recently converted pagans in western Europe will still celebrating their old holidays, which celebrated the birth of Cthulhu or what have you. As much as people will try to tell you otherwise, Christmas is not and never was about anyone being born, it's about giving each other presents. –Jette 13:58, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, Christmas is named after Hamsters. It used to be pronounced as "Threstmaeh" which is an anagram of "The Hamster". True story. Proves that Hamsterianity is the one and only religion, hmmhmm hmhmm. Dark Morphon 16:43, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- ^ WTF?--/u/nendingfear 19x19px 17:10, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- I don't really know why Christians should comemmorate Jesus' birth either. He didn't help anyone as a baby, he didn't miraclize as a baby... in fact, everyone gets born... | 72 (UTC) 19:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- For that matter, why do we celebrate anyone's birthday? Martin Luther King, Jr. is dead and doesn't accept presents anymore. Vili 点 09:05, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Merry Christmas, Titani!
I wuff you sometimes. Ryuu - talk 05:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy New Year! =D
--/u/nendingfear 19x19px 05:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- 1+ Ryuu - talk 06:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Happy New Year Titani! Shadow Runner 13:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Merry Christmas again
→[ »Halogod (talk)« ]← 20:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Where are you?
You're missing all the fun :P - J.P.Talk 19:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ahey there. What did I miss? Titani Ertan 07:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Welcome back. You missed Wyn's resignation, and other tasty drama. Poor you. :< --neshot 08:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Wyn resigned? Did Pedobear land freeze!?
- Also, just seen the February skill updates, and about to rewrite User:Titani Ertan/Why completely. Juicy ideas coming.
- Ahh... so good to be back? Titani Ertan 08:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Check her arbcomm for what happened.--neshot 09:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG You're back ^_______^--/ u /nendingfear 19x19px 15:34, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm back. So much to do, and I barely have time for my own job. If I delve into the Wiki, it'll be like a second and third job... :/ Titani Ertan 15:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, ok :< I can make it less of a job? :> Though, I may accidentally a flame war again v.v--/ u /nendingfear 19x19px 16:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Overall, if I don't dedicate a lot of time to the wiki, I won't be of any help at all. I don't play GW, so my contributions to Main is limited, and replying to people about game balance takes a chunk of time; both to read, and write. So, why just clug RC and make admins mad at me? You all know where to find me. (pssssst; MailUser). Titani Ertan 16:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Do you have MSN? :>--/ u /nendingfear 19x19px 17:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Titani Ertan 19:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- You are here again. Happy feelings. -- Cyan 19:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- May I please have that MSN? :>--/ u /nendingfear 19x19px 21:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Unending, may you be healthy. Titani Ertan 22:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- But I'm not healthy v.v--/ u /nendingfear 19x19px 22:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Good to see you again! Shadow Runner 09:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
I highly doubt you'll read this but anyway. You ever coming back? You need to ragequit in an epic fashion before you can up and leave ;) Shadow Runner 21:37, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- And do not ragequit without insulting Shard. Koda Kumi 22:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC)