Talk:Bonetti

Bonneti rocks. I freaked the first time I saw him. Dancing Gnome 22:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

i'll add a trivia that a skill is named after him. —ZerphaThe Improver 13:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Confirmed with SoC that he has same skills in both normal and hard mode. Tedium 07:46, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

all bosses have the same skills in normal and in hm to prevent making the Skill Hunter title easier. —ZerphaThe Improver 13:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I hate how hard it was to find him. At first he didn't spawn, and then later he was being raped by gargoyles, and as always when mobs fight each other, his body disappeared. I killed the gargoyles and that stupid grawl boss in revenge. 76.232.48.233 03:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

No real reason to need his corpse. Just saw him (for the first time!), and happened to have a Signet of Capture; the page seems to be exactly correct in terms of his skills. No drop for me, though. 128.12.32.10 21:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

he definitally should have had his own unique sword.--72.189.84.187 07:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

I was suprised the first time I saw him, in hard mode. That's cool that he's there, though! --The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.92.184.201 (talk).

Named after

Why here do we word it that Bonetti was named after the skill, but for other pages like Teinai, we word it that she has skills named after her? There is precedent for "This skill is named after" for NPCs with only one skill named after them (see: Kitah). Does this have to do with the fact that he is an enemy rather than an ally? -«troy.frostwind­» 14:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

It's almost a chicken-and-egg argument. The skill is a reference to a movie. ArenaNet then wanted the skill to have context in the game, so they created a character.

It appears as though the skill was named after the NPC, but it really was not. I would prefer that the trivia on this page said so in some manner, but I can't think of proper wording at the moment. G R E E N E R 15:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

I saw that, but yeah, the wording on that wasn't clear. I like the way that you worded it, and it clears up the potential for confusion now. Cheers -«troy.frostwind­» 15:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

No prob, and I was verbose for posterity's sake – It seems like this issue has come up before. G R E E N E R 16:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)