Talk:Destructive Was Glaive (PvP)

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

I like how they have a PvP-Only version set-up for a future change to the skill. =P -Curin Derwin 09:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

vs Cruel was Daoshen[edit]

Is anyone going to run this in PvP when Cruel Was Daoshen basically does the same thing? --Combatter 16:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Recharge, energy cost, casting time and range of AoE. This is way better. Misery 16:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
^ Glaive has the potential to do far greater damage due to having 1/3 the recharge, half cast time, and a lower energy cost to a far greater number of foes (ward range versus nearbgy range). CwD is way too easy to shutdwon and can't be used nearly often enough to be effective--TahiriVeila 16:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Personally in terms of drop nuking, this is better. But if you just want a passive armor penetration for your spells, stick with CwD. This way you can free your slot for useful elites such as Caretaker's Charge. →[ »Halogod User Halogod35 Sig.png (talk ]← 08:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Also, CWD deals more raw damage at once from a drop. I always wonder... why don't people ever capitalize "Was?" :\ -~=Ϛρѧякγ User Sparky, the Tainted guided sig.png (τѧιк) 00:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Question[edit]

How does this skill react with skills such as Renewing Surge and Ancestor's Rage that you don't activly inflict the damage? do you still get the 10% armor penetration or no? --174.130.8.142 22:36, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Those skills are armour-ignoring. 90.206.126.217 15:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

You still get the bonus.Tried it with renewing and it does 11 without DwG and 15 with it.95.180.76.188 19:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)