Talk:Destructive Was Glaive (PvP)

I like how they have a PvP-Only version set-up for a future change to the skill. =P -Curin Derwin 09:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

vs Cruel was Daoshen

Is anyone going to run this in PvP when Cruel Was Daoshen basically does the same thing? --Combatter 16:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Recharge, energy cost, casting time and range of AoE. This is way better. Misery 16:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

^ Glaive has the potential to do far greater damage due to having 1/3 the recharge, half cast time, and a lower energy cost to a far greater number of foes (ward range versus nearbgy range). CwD is way too easy to shutdwon and can't be used nearly often enough to be effective--TahiriVeila 16:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Personally in terms of drop nuking, this is better. But if you just want a passive armor penetration for your spells, stick with CwD. This way you can free your slot for useful elites such as Caretaker's Charge. →[ »Halogod (talk)« ]← 08:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Also, CWD deals more raw damage at once from a drop. I always wonder... why don't people ever capitalize "Was?" :\ -~=Ϛρѧякγ (τѧιк) 00:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Question

How does this skill react with skills such as Renewing Surge and Ancestor's Rage that you don't activly inflict the damage? do you still get the 10% armor penetration or no? --174.130.8.142 22:36, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Those skills are armour-ignoring. 90.206.126.217 15:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

You still get the bonus.Tried it with renewing and it does 11 without DwG and 15 with it.95.180.76.188 19:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)