Talk:Noob

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

I'm in favour of deleting and remaking the article to keep this crap out of the history. -- Gordon Ecker 01:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Is there an older version of this file somewhere already? I swear I spent a bit of time (an age ago) on a neutral version of a Noob/Newb article here - but it seems to have been deleted. --Aspectacle 02:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, it was tagged for deletion because the term isn't exclusive to Guild Wars, and got deleted because the deletion request was unopposed. Are there any objections to undeleting the old versions once this version gets zapped? -- Gordon Ecker 08:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Done. -- Gordon Ecker 02:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Still not deleted!? --Stokoe Talk 17:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I am a noob :) AlcamiLord 00:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Phrase wording[edit]

"It is not most often given to those who claim expert knowledge, or ability in the game but have proven to those observing that the exact opposite is true". Ok, right now, having the "not" in there doesn't make sense. But, apparently the phrase is also wrong without it. Backsword, what is the intent of what you are trying to get across? --JonTheMon 16:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I think he is trying to say that just because you call someone a noob doesn't make them bad. Should be rephrased to intent and meaning rather than fact. Misery 16:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
how about: "It is frequently given to those who claim expert knowledge, skills, or ability in the game but show with their actions that the exact opposite is true"? --JonTheMon 19:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Until someone generates statistics, it's going to have to be "frequently". I mean, if we want to go off of what we individually see the term used for, I'd be perfectly justified in saying that "The term is almost exclusively used as a jest between familiar players; its use as a serious insult has been antiquated," which may or may not (I'd assume that it isn't true for the majority of players, actually, but that's just an assumption) be true. The point is, until I can show evidence that that is, in fact, the case, then I can't just claim that it is on a mainspace article. Any objections to frequently? I'll change it in 24 hours if no objections are raised. User Raine R.gif Raine - talk 00:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Edited article[edit]

Modified to express more correct usage based on what over 95% of people consider it to be. Most consider 'noob' and 'newb' to be two different terms- newb for newbie, inexperienced players, and noobs for stupid arrogant trash that suck at gws. This is coming from a noob himself xD Owut 17:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

sn00b[edit]

I've never heard this term before, but I wanted to get someone else's opinion before reverting. I don't hang out in kamadan so I don't keep up with the pve lingo. ~Shard User Shard Sig Icon.png 00:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Never heard of it, either. King Neoterikos 00:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
I move to remove. --JonTheMon 01:41, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
[1] Dominator Matrix 01:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Credible Urban Dictionary is credible. ~Shard User Shard Sig Icon.png 01:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Portmanteau of snob and noob? syn // talk talk page -- 16:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
I've never heard of this term before today either. My guess is that it's either what syn suggested, or a portmanteau of "stupid" and "noob". - Zaxares 06:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Other related terms...[edit]

Should this paragraph actually be on the page? We may as well just list all insults, because that's basically what it's describing (and tbh, "noob" is most often just used as an insult regardless of whether the victim is actually new or bad, or not). Widowmaker 17:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC)