Talk:Well of Power

Kinda looks like the flipped image of Well of Blood Halogod35 06:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I swear, if Izzy nerfs THIS cuz of Sway... That would be horrible. ~~ 66.57.17.110 20:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

man, can someone make this link when i search "well of power", w/o caps? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.216.53.189 (talk • contribs) at 19:10, June 12, 2008 (UTC).

First, sign please (Four tildes). Second, one redirect coming up! I thought that capitalization was fixed in searching, but I guess not after doing research. --Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 19:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

It will be fixed once IT installs the LuceneSearch extension (the same thing that's used on Wikipedia). Calor 19:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Awesome. --Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 19:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

WTB recharge time of non-elite version. Noctarch 00:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Whats funny is the longer recharge time on this actually makes it a more friendly skill for heros, avoids conflict with MMs on the team. Heros love to burn every corpse in the area--Justice 00:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Well of Power vs BIP on N/Rt Healer

I tried replacing BIP by this spell on my N/Rt healer, it could have been a great skill but the long recharge time makes it impossible for heroes to use it on the right corpse. They can use it on the corpse of an ennemy caster and thus making only your melee character benefit from it instead of your 7 casters if it would have been used on an ennemy melee monster. Unless you wanna spend your life micromanaging your hero, it's not worth bringing. Wolfsen

Yes, no, maybe

Instead of reverting back and forth, could the two IPs playing with the phrase "*Stacks with Well of Blood for more health regeneration." maybe say why they want it removed and/or left there? Is it true, not true, too obvious... -- FreedomBound 16:03, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Too obivous. 88.148.216.26 16:05, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Ok. It helps to put your reasoning in the edit summaries, rather than just blanking a line. Now, I looked at the well spell article, and note that it does not state that all wells stack. Do all wells stack? Is this something that every guild war player knows, instinctively? Will players come to this page wonder if they can use well of power and well of blood at the same time? If the answer to the first question is yes, but the second or third answer is no or yes respectively, I think the note should remain. Thoughts? -- FreedomBound 16:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I was thinking that since 'wells being "stackable" as long there are exploitable corpses' is a game mechanic applicable to all wells, perhaps the note would be more appropriate if put on the Well page itself(rephrased in a more general way, of course). That is, assuming the well page doesn't already contain something similar. Most Japanese Greetings 16:20, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

(editing conlfit) the general player isnt that smart i guess. and some wells are so similar one would assume they dont stack (especially becus well of power is the elite well of blood). plus no one would wonder if wells effects didnt stack. i think it was a programmer decision. you can know that but you cant understand that decision so the note shuld be put back. 128.176.178.20 16:21, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

However, if we have the note remain, we would have to explain that all offensive wells(wells that affect foes) stack with each other too. I still believe that it should belong on the Well page instead of having a separate note on each well page. Most Japanese Greetings 16:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

i think that is okay but a silly ip shouldnt just remove that without any subsutitute 128.176.178.20 16:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Let's try to have this discussion remain civil, and going back on topic, what substitute do you suggest, if any and applicable? Most Japanese Greetings 16:37, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

maybe an anchor link to a section fo the well page which tells about the special things of wells. i know there are always links to teh skill type page but wells are very unnormal and many people dont use them often so a direct link to special stuff is useful 128.176.178.20 16:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The problem is that a direct link referring to the well page is already found below the Well image icon(the link in the "Type" Section) for players who want to find out more about wells. I know many editors dislike linking to the same page multiple times in an article, but I do agree that it might be clearer for newer players to have it in the "Notes" section as well. Most Japanese Greetings 16:47, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) There are already three links to the well page in the article (infobox, description, notes). I don't think adding another one will help that much. -- FreedomBound 16:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

no no no i dont mean link to the page but an anchor link to the special section like see Well#Special Stuff about Wells of course it doesnt exist but that is what i mesan it should be created 128.176.178.20 16:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)