Talk:Zaishen Order

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

lol they know how to get to hoh and stuff... then how the hell do their builds suck so bad?? 98.221.120.211 01:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Members[edit]

Aren't the hostile npc's members aswell?--Markisbeest 14:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Indeed they are. You see, that's why they're still under ==Memsers==, they're under a sub-section under that section. They're simply under a second table in order to prevent confusion between the two. -- Konig/talk 14:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Reorganize[edit]

I propose reorganizeing them By Rank (or Status/Job) & By Location, such as GtoB, IotN, MK, EB, PVP-outposts, Non-core putposts. --Falconeye 04:03, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
We don't need to have them listed twice (as that's what it seems you're suggesting). TBH, I don't think any of the NPCs in Embark Beach that are listed are actually of the Zaishen Order (Ahjek looks Elonian and his dialogue implies being an adventurer from there; likewise the Sworns specifically mention hearing what the Zaishen are doing and decided to see for themselves - which heavily implies not being part of the Zaishen Order; Ra definably is though). Also, I don't think that we need to list every single NPC of the order - that's what categories are for. I say list: 1) the important (what's now "High Council" and "Officers") and the generic (some of the "Other"). -- Konig/talk 04:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Now it looks cleaner; I just didnt like how the entire bar was being squished together on smaller screens; I followed Sunpears' page example and moved units to tabs that can only be found in certain outposts. ^_^ --Falconeye 21:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Cleaner, but unnecessarily large. Again, we do not need to mention every single NPC like the table is doing. In fact, for consistency sake, it should only list generic NPCs. -- Konig/talk 06:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)