Template talk:Skill type infobox
Since I'm out of reverts, could you stop vandalising the template because you don't like the name? If you have a better idea, just change it. Or at least suggest it here, or on a formating page. Don't be disruptive to prove a point. Backsword 19:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Explain what you want the name to mean. --JonTheMon 19:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- I don't want it to mean anything else. You're the one with the issue. It's one of the clear tecdhnical traits skill typers have, and should be listed. Backsword 19:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Do you mean if more than 1 of each particular skill type be in effect at a given time? --JonTheMon 19:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- I don't want it to mean anything else. You're the one with the issue. It's one of the clear tecdhnical traits skill typers have, and should be listed. Backsword 19:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Please explain what you want to express with that parameter, Backsword. Your revisions are lacking a description about what it is and "slot" or "shared slot" doesn't really express what it is. poke | talk 19:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not perfectly happy with it my self, which is why I tried to leave it as open for edits as possible. If you have an idea for how to express it more clearly, please make the change. Backsword 19:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Documenting the template[edit]
What does the super and sub types stand for? At first, i would guess it is related to the way skill types are sorted in the skill type article, but that would be just me guessing again.
And on a related topic, may i suggest extending a bit the short summary that i guess will be added for all skill types to something more user-friendly? Took me a few tries to understand what "Skill Type. Type for magic with positive effects and a duration. Full list of skills." meant :P.--Fighterdoken 21:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Rituals[edit]
The Ritual page shows zero skills, I suppose because "nature rituals" are not also considered "rituals", ditto for the other two types. Any way to fix it? Manifold 21:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)