User talk:72.148.31.114/Archive1

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search


Feedback

If you are User:Ariyen please log in before further editing in the feedback namespace. Thanks. -- Wyn User Wynthyst sig icon2.png talk 06:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

I didn't edit anything. Just registered. Ariyen 06:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

I realize that, but there are legal reasons why you need to be logged in when you create/edit suggestions, so I just wanted to mention it. -- Wyn User Wynthyst sig icon2.png talk 06:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh, didn't know you had to be logged in to enter your id - to be added in the feedback area - didn't see that stated. So, I gotta redo that? Also, when I do try to edit etc. (even though sometimes it'll show me logged in. I try to redo by logging in and fixing it to show it was me or say it in the discussion. Ariyen 06:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

No, you don't have to redo it, I just wanted to make sure you logged in before you started adding suggestions. -- Wyn User Wynthyst sig icon2.png talk 06:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Okay, will try to make sure I'm logged in. Ariyen 07:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Talk page comments

Please stop removing talk page comments. -- Wyn User Wynthyst sig icon2.png talk 04:32, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Fuck The Sites

They havent had any edits since August and they were made by Wyn. They obviously dont care about the wiki page, so it should be inactive. User DrogoBoffin sig icon.png Drogo Boffin 21:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Can't F the sites, due to the Guild Policy on "Condition 2: Inactivity outside of Wiki - Any listed forum and/or website has not received any GW-related edits for 3 months." So they're not to be inactive due to Condition 2. -- User Ariyen sig icon.gifriyen 21:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


moved to User_talk:42

Bonuses

http://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=List_of_weapon_upgrades&diff=1802589&oldid=1802474
Please explain the reason of undo of my note "Nightfall bonuses are also available in Eye of the North." with reason "Most bonuses are avaliable there from cantha, etc. too."

More exactly: Bonuses which are mentioned in the table as Nightfall-specifics, like inscriptions, are available in EotN as well. They are not available from Cantha, etc. with a few exceptions. In other words, the "Nightfall" campaign in the table means "Nightfall and EotN". What was wrong? --Slavic 14:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

They have dropped in other places besides those 'specifics'. It's like you're only narrowing to those 'specifics. That's why I undid you. 72.148.31.114 19:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Unfortunately, your answer is too short and not enough clear, although I tried to decrypt it... If you mean that bonuses which are marked in the table as Nightfall-specifics are in fact not Nightfall-specifics because they have dropped in other places as well, then it's not a problem with my changes but with meaning of "Nightfall" in the existed table. If so, you should try to explain this in the article and attempt to improve a table from current state. I hope you have noticed that EotN is omitted in the table. If you have a suggestion other than my addition or than replacing the "Nightfall" with "Nightfall and EotN" in the table, please tell it, maybe your solution is better. --Slavic 08:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
How about adding Eye of the North to the Nightfall in the tables? Might that help? -- User Ariyen sig icon.gifriyen 08:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)