User talk:AidanReed/Archive

You need to stop adding that to Herta. Continually adding it would be considered vandalism. --JonTheMon 21:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

How can it be vandalism if it's true? If sh's supporting, she is supporting for me too! Refussal to accept this would equal to the refusal of accepting my excistance. Vandalism is a big word, I'm not sure wether you used it in the right context here.

Like this:

My anwser is: "Continuing ro refuse usefull information is called flaming."

No it isn't I am not alowed to use that word in this sentence, nor are you. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:AidanReed (talk).

First off, on talk pages it's common courtesy to sign your comments with ~~~~ which will fill in your signature for you. Secondly, what makes you so special that your name should be on the article? Third, how do you even know she's cheering for you and not your foe? Fourth, it's vandalism if you continue to add it against the community's decision. Also, bear in mind we have a policy called GWW:1RR. Read up on it. --JonTheMon 21:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The community isn't responding to the change YOU are. It was obvious who answer your question, so putting 10 more characters forming a fictional name behind it wasn't neccesary. Why do YOU think you're so special to play internet police? You state the community is against my update, while you took it down two minutes after launch, so the community couldn't even decide wether I wanted it or not. That's called censorship.

If you really want to claim that the community doesn't want the change, you need to give the community the chance to read the change. It's hypocracy to claim that there is a community behind you that told you what to do, as you where obvious responsible for your own actions, which came from your own ideas, not those of an annonymous crowd.

Therefor you manupilate the idea of a comunity-generated information source to your own bidding. That's a bad thing Jon, a bad thing. AidanReed 21:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The wiki is for documeting the game, not one person. Our names are not on there, so yours should not be either. In terms of valndalism, we have a policy on on revert rules. Its worth a read. :) -- Wandering Traveler 22:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

LOL did you notice that your change got reverted by 4 others? I'd say that's a quick consensus. And just lol at the rest. --JonTheMon 22:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Explain to me how these aren't vandalism? *grin* AidanReed 22:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Talk page comments

I know you're probably not feeling too happy about the above section, but comments can't be removed, per GWW:USER. You can Archive the comments if you'd like, however. :) -- Wandering Traveler 22:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)