User talk:Ardangoeswiki/Archive2

Instead of creating new feedback pages, just use the discussion page if you are trying to further emphasize the point of an already made suggestion. FleshAndFaith 23:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Sir YES SIR. How many suggestors/admins are there on this thing? Damn. You guys get paid to do this? Ardangoeswiki 03:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

FleshAndFaith isn't an admin.

I am, though! And, as an admin, I'd like to know if I can delete this page; this really should be on the talk page of Mora's suggestion. Thanks! — Raine Valen 3:48, 29 Oct 2010 (UTC)

Nope, not an admin. But they do pay me to be here, because they value my opinion greatly. And I concur, delete and move. FleshAndFaith 15:26, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Of course you'd concur. Are your lips glued to him/her? lol please. Internet Gestapo kiddies. gg. And due to the lack of examining players' suggestions, I had posted this page to emphasize in the open what another user had posted. And will do so again if it calls for it. I am not replying to anything after this, as I find most users a waste of my time, as most kids on the internet are. Ardangoeswiki 16:24, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

If you think personal attacks enforce your point, the rest of the internet is your battlefield, not this site. Also, I stand by Raine's point that this "suggestion" is rather pointless. The validity of the idea is what is considered, not the amount of people who support it. Koda Kumi 17:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

To emphasize your support for another user's suggestion, you don't clog up the suggestion portal with non-suggestions. Can you see how that hurts everyone? The proper avenue for showing support is, as has been stated, to comment on the suggestion's talk page. You're very free to move this to the talk page of the other suggestion, and that'd be ideal for everyone else, too.

Short of that, though, I'll have to either (1) delete this page according to some existing policy or (2) get a policy amended so that I may delete this non-suggestion suggestion page within its boundaries. Either of those, though, is much more work than simply deleting it as a user-requested deletion, and I'd like this to be as easy as possible for everyone involved. :D

Once again, I have no problem with you showing your support; I do have an issue with the way you're electing to do it. Thanks for taking this into consideration.

Now, would you mind if deleted this page? — Raine Valen 22:04, 30 Oct 2010 (UTC)

If it'd make your badge more shiny and your keyring larger, as well as your attitude and ego, go for it. Now that we're getting a barrage of no-name nobodies putting their 2 cents in to drag out the issue instead of squashing it. Ardangoeswiki 22:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) It's not about my opinion; I don't even know what Mora's suggestion is, so I can't support or oppose your actual support for it with any real merit (for the record, there are plenty of suggestions in the namespace that I've opposed outright based on their content; this isn't one of them). This isn't about me not liking you or some personal vendetta; I don't know who you are outside of this talk page. This isn't about a "bigger keyring" or "shinier badge"; I don't get brownie points for deleting things, and I probably wouldn't care if I did. This isn't about my ego; I've said exactly what I believe would be best for the wiki: suggestions that are not actually suggestions don't belong on the suggestion portal.

I asked earlier if you understood why that was detrimental; I'll be clearer. Every non-suggestion in the namespace detracts from suggestions in the suggestion portal. If I were a developer, I would not want to wade through maybe-or-maybe-not suggestions when I go to the suggestion portal; would you? Accordingly, to make the devs' jobs easier, I'm trying to clean that up before it becomes problematic. Everyone benefits from this, including the person whose suggestion you are supporting with your non-suggestion.

However, if you have a better solution, I'm more than willing to do that, instead. It's for this reason that I'd prefer not to "just squash it": you have an issue, and wikis are based on consensus.

Also, I'll remind you to be civil and address arguments, not contributors. Thanks bunches! — Raine Valen 23:26, 30 Oct 2010 (UTC)

Suggest we simply abandon this whole topic. We tried to explain that the feedback pages are not forum posts, but individual topics and can be discussed in the discussion on the relevant pages, but Arden took our advice to be hostile attacks. Let him sit here and be edgy and cool, dismissing us children. FleshAndFaith 04:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

That's also not constructive. — Raine Valen 5:02, 31 Oct 2010 (UTC)

I didn't even read wtf you all typed, and really don't care, you guys are still going on? delete it already. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.............................. Ardangoeswiki 02:16, 1 November 2010 (UTC)