User talk:NoXiFy/Archive 2

Needed a new start to my talk page. Hopefully I didnt break any rules by changing this. It is MY page. --'ÑöẊĭƑý 22:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Actually... yes, GWW:USER, but is easy to fix if you do what HELP:ARCHIVE says :).--Fighterdoken 22:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) I've archived the comments for you, as per Guild Wars Wiki:User pages. Please leave the link on this page, and archive in future. -- Brains12 22:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

FoW armor

It's sexy, don't ya think. My monk is now beast.--'ÑöẊĭƑý 22:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

User page

Your userpage is in violation of User page policy. Maximum size for user mainpage is 300k, yours is 500+. You may want to reupload a smaller version of the very large picture, or just remove it all together.-- Wynthyst 22:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Rather than harrassing other users why don't you do something productive and fix your own page?-- Wynthyst 23:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

tbh, i dont really want to fix it. it looks nice. if you want to do it for me, thats great. but besides that please dont accuse me for harassing others as i am not. --'ÑöẊĭƑý 23:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protect my userpage

is it possible? --'ÑöẊĭƑý 23:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

lol so i herd pissing off ska and tab is asking for anons to troll your user talk? ur gettin pissed off with me aren't you? ooh look who's getting harrassed now! 80.193.1.106 23:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

admin pl0x? srsly. -_---'ÑöẊĭƑý 23:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

osure now you can =D 80.193.1.106 23:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

While this is dealth with you may want to: Stop reverting (you can do it later anyways regardless of how much it is vandalized), stop discussing (that only gives another reason to keep going), and reupload the image within the 150kb recomended size :).--Fighterdoken 00:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

told. w0rd 80.193.1.106 00:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

kk, hope this can be fixed by tommo. thx a billion --'ÑöẊĭƑý 00:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

lawl, for srs, ever herd of sockpuppetry? proxies? some things are never solved =] 80.193.1.106 00:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

lawl for srs, this person seems to be very childish. Drago 00:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

lawl for srs, I r bored, and noxify r fial, and ska roolz 80.193.1.106 00:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

exactly drago. very childish, and he probaly has to much spare time as he keeps reverting the reverts and giving me a whole new main page.--'ÑöẊĭƑý 00:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

o ya ofc 80.193.1.106 00:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

trolling

I think you'll find this comment counts as trolling: "can someone ban this troll pl0x. he's annoying as fuck.--'ÑöẊĭƑýtalk 21:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)", and is what caused this troll-fest -- Salome 01:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

How's that trolling? I simply posted that the user is annoying and needs a ban. I didn't just randomly intervene and say something. I made a whole new category (and at that time, I didn't know about the admin noticeboard, where I should've reported the issue)--'ÑöẊĭƑý 01:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

it's trolling and trying to rationalise doesnt change that. -- Salome 01:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

how is this 'trolling' though. I did not understand issues should be brought to the admin noticeboard. I have a better solution though. lets just drop this whole thing and say... screw it. :) --'ÑöẊĭƑý 01:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough. :) -- Salome 01:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Everyone

loves to attack you don't they. Owut 13:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Izzy archive

Uhm... WTF?, most of those discussion are still fresh and going on. What u archive it for? ~ Kurd 16:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Way too damn long. And way over the recomandations. --'ÑöẊĭƑý 16:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

You should not be archiving ongoing discussions.-- Wynthyst 16:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

i couldnt see the ongoing discussions because of the page length. if someone wants to find the exace posts that were being discussed, be my guest. -_-.--'ÑöẊĭƑý 16:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

There were several of those discussions that had entries as late as yesterday, imo that would qualify as an ongoing discussion. Isn't a week the standard cut off?-- Wynthyst 16:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Yup a week is. -- Salome 16:54, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

I think "you made the mess, you should clean it up" is more appropriate than "if someone wants to find the exace posts that were being discussed, be my guest" -- Wynthyst 16:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

well im too busy to do that myself. if u want to unarchive the whole thing and make it look fugly, have fun. ;).--'ÑöẊĭƑý 16:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

If you can't archive properly, you shouldn't archive.-- Wynthyst 16:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

tbh im an imba archiver. ;)--'ÑöẊĭƑý 17:00, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Next time: if you know you're not going to spend time on it. Don't do it. ~ Kurd 17:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Ever heard the phrase, "if it's worth the time to do something, it's worth the time to do it right" - well, that applies here. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 17:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

page looks like shit n0w. :/--'ÑöẊĭƑý 17:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Then archive it properly, if you wish. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 17:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

How incredibly IMBA I am.

CURRENT BAN:

OLD BANS:

Okay majorly big pics, can you not make those pics a tad on the smaller side? Also how did you go from a perma ban to a 332 hour ban to a 49 hour ban at the mo, seems odd. And also racism = bad. -- Salome 17:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

perma-ban = my second account for scamming. 400hour racial ban is from before /report when i used a certain word that starts with N and ends with an R many, many, many times. The 49 hour ban is my currentt ban.

I reduced your pic size so that your talk page is still viewable in a normal manner. In relation to the pics, do you not think that it might be an idea to crop the images so only the wee info box is showing rather than the whole background? As the whole background isnt really needed to get your point across and it would reduce the loading times on your page. Also stop getting banned! bad noxify, bad! -- Salome 17:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

i had them like that but people called them fakes. =(--'ÑöẊĭƑý 18:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

why care what people think of you? If they don't believe you, screw em. -- Salome 18:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

HELP

How do I make a term entered in search redirect to a page. For example, if you type Izzy, it redirects to Isiah Cartwrigts page. Whats the code and where do i add it as i would like to add some to some pages.

You add #redirect [[page to redirect to]]. It should be the first thing on the page, nothing before it. - anja 17:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)