User talk:Noctarch/Archive Finale

First

is still lame, but I cant let it aside ^^ |Cyan LightLive!| 11:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

<.< Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 11:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! |Cyan LightLive!| 09:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Shadow Form - legit?

							Elite

Dagger Mastery : 11+1+3

Shadow Arts : 10+3

Critical Strikes : 10+1

128.176.178.42 13:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

SoD says no imo. - Y0_ich_halt 15:33, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Replace it with like.. Uh.... Something remedy. -- Halogod35 16:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Eh?

Which policy do I hide from? Misery 18:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I elabourated that earlier. You need to link to your user page or your talk page in your signature. Since you user page doesn't exist, the link is invalid that is to say you don't link to what you should following the signature policy. Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 18:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

It's recommended, not required. — Jon Lupen 18:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh, now I remember this logic ^______^ Misery 18:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

No, it is mus, read carefully:

Links

You >>must<< at least include a link to either your user page or your talk page. It may optionally also include a link to your contributions. Aside from the above three links, no other internal or external links are allowed. If there are useful pages you wish to bookmark, place them in your user page, not your signature. Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 19:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Read your quote again, either user page or talk page. His sig has a link to his user page, so it's still inside policy. — Jon Lupen 19:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Uhm, you know you can't interact in any way with something that doesn't exist? Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 19:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

You can still get to his talk page from his user page even though it doesn't exist. It would be nice if his sig linked to his talk page, but I can see why he doesn't have to. For a while my sig linked to only my user page. — Jon Lupen 19:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

And still it is has been a break of the policy. Get it, it's called logic. Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 19:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm not following your logic or your sentence. — Jon Lupen 19:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

"One's logic" is non-existent because of its absolute value. Here, the three examples of the "link rule break":

1. You have no link in your signature. No link covers not having a link to either user page or user talk page.

2. You have a link to a page that is neither your user page nor your user talk page. This also cover above break.

3. You have a link to something that could be your user page if it existed but it doesn't exist. Since you don't have a user page you cannot link to it and when you don't also have a link to your user talk page (assuming it does exist) this is a break.

Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 19:33, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

This is where logic breaks down a bit, and your relying on personal definitions. In my definition, he still has a user page, because I can click the link to it, be taken to an empty page that works like any other wiki page, but just doesn't have any content, but still has a link to his talk page. — Jon Lupen 19:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Jon, this ≠ this Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 19:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

*Shrugs* — Jon Lupen 19:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

The purpose(s) of having a userpage - to show information about oneself (if one wishes) and for it to act as a gateway to communicating with that user. Whether you click a link to an existent userpage or non-existent userpage, the gateway for communication (i.e. the tabs) is still available. That's what the signature policy means - you should link to your userpage or talk page so people can easily communicate with you. Misery's signature only breaks the policy when you distort the policy's intent. -- Brains12 \ talk 19:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

^^ Better wording but same general idea. ^^ — Jon Lupen 19:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't deny it, I didn't when I first mentioned this. My intention is that you don't have to distort the actual wording since it allows this interpretation. I guess I also adviced to reword it. <__< Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 19:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Or the whole argument falls apart when I point out that my signature also contains a link to my talk page. Misery 20:04, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

O_o. *Gets out ah magnifying glass.* OTOH, arguing that a link isn't a link because the destination dosen't exist is silly. This is a link too, though it probably dosn't go anywhere. Furthermore, is it not considered true that an unmodified wikisignature (a) is always valid and (b) would contain a redlink to User:Misery also?

I'd prefer that the "Misery" be a blue link to the talk page, as that would be most useful to readers, but you can't make that policy require it with those words. --Star Weaver 20:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Skill bar thingy

Hey! I like the skill bar thingy that you're putting in, but for some reason I'm seeing a 1px white line between the bottom of the actual skills and the bottom frame of the actual skill bar? Is this only on my end, or is there a problem with the template table? --★KOKUOU★ 00:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

It surely is on your end, which browser/resolution do you use? Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 00:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, I have IE (7.0.6) open when playing GW (because I have like a gajillion tabs saved on Firefox, which makes my game lag), so I just saw it on that. However, I opened Firefox to check, and you're right, it's not there. I suppose it's a problem with IE7, then. o_O --★KOKUOU★ 00:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

IE is seriously inferior. And if you have RAM problems with only FF and GW I suggest getting a new machine or more memory. =/ Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 00:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Le sigh. I know, you're right. I've tried upping the RAM on it from 2GB to 4GB, but the restriction on Windows 32-bit Vista says, "nuh-uh." I suppose I really should get a desktop (currently on an Alienware notebook), but my desk is so small, iono where I'd put it. --★KOKUOU★ 00:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Templates

please do not tag templates that are used on nearly 2000 articles for deletion, it really messed up the cache on the wiki, and obviously makes it look like we need to delete 2000 articles!! --Lemming 22:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

:P Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 22:52, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Searching an alliance?

We small guilds! Actually, we only are small guilds ^^ If you want, lets hear it. |Cyan LightLive!| 15:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

As long as no guild within your alliance have one of those activities that are listed under "never", I wouldn't say no. Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 15:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

We are not focused on these things, we are only focused on playing as we like and to have fun. There is of course always someone who RA sometimes or doing some other things on the 'never' list from you but that isnt our main bizznizz ^^ |Cyan LightLive!| 15:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Online status helps >:) Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 17:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Maybe it does indeed ^^ |Cyan LightLive!| 10:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Congratulations Noctarch! Have a great day and see you in game! |Cyan LightLive!| 09:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

O Thank you. Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 09:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm a little late to wish you a happy birthday, but I hope you enjoyed yourself =P --Kivah 09:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

orly? -- Wandering Traveler 03:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Yarly -- Halogod35 03:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

what the hell is a farm sucker? (i dont do rules well) ПALANA 21:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Header

Does your recent edit mean you are less angry? Misery 23:19, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

"I ruled the night until the darkness clutched my soul."
"Would I care about being dead after I died? I always wondered."
"If I know I don't believe, can I believe that I do know?" And if not, can I believe that I don't know if I don't know if I believe?" — Doubter's handbook

oh dear.. ПALANA 01:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

>:D bwahaha indeed ПALANA 03:15, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Funny

Taken directly from urban dictionary.. idk but i felt the need to put this here...

• Funny
• 1. haha
• 2. strange
• 1. person 1: ouch

person 2: haha!

• 2. that's funny, i could have sworn there was something in my pants Kelli 05:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

...I will eat your cookies if u dont come back :( --Neil2250 19:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)