User talk:Raine Valen/Archive 33

To Do:

• Delete subpages for Yas & Adrin
• Archive this bitch.
• Schmooze. — Raine Valen 19:24, 20 Mar 2011 (UTC)

Seeing as how you know more than I, did those two want their subpages gone as well? G R E E N E R 19:54, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Indeed. iPod, though, so it'll wait. — Raine Valen 20:00, 20 Mar 2011 (UTC)

I'm guessing that this Guild Wars Wiki talk:Formatting/Skills isn't in your priority list anymore? I think they are trying to revitalize the "debate" --Lania 15:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't see a feasible way to do it without Poke magic. — Raine Valen 14:00, 23 Mar 2011 (UTC)

I saw my name? poke | talk 19:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

It basically boils down to defining every attribute of every skill (including conditional ones in an "if, then" format), then creating a form to search for skills based on those attributes, e.g. "skills that cost less than 20 energy, are not in a primary attribute, and cause knockdown on weakened foes". It would be an enormous pain in the arse. — Raine Valen 1:08, 24 Mar 2011 (UTC)

Hahaha SMW losers elix Omni 03:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

More invoke buffs!

Olololololmao. Raw damage/second potential means it's a buff in ra. Faster recharge mean it's a buff in HA (chain lightnig spikes killed before, trollolol), since it can be used with Chain faster than spirit bond recharges (remember SF spike? Air eles don't need that. :\). Ffs. — Raine Valen 4:53, 23 Mar 2011 (UTC)

RA? HA? These words are unfamiliar to me. Riddle the Carebear. 05:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

It's only really nerfed in GvG, where you need super clean spikes because the AoE won't blow up non-spike targets. :\ — Raine Valen 13:58, 23 Mar 2011 (UTC)

[LaG] seems to have disagreed with you over that. They rolled over [WHAT] in the mAT with an Invoke spike. -- Oiseau | 20:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Kiss me, I'm shitfaced. <3--TahiriVeila 04:11, 11 April 2011 (UTC)