User talk:SabreWolf
Clan Heavy Metal[edit]
Clan Heavy Metal Started over 10 years ago in a game called Team Fortress... since then, the clan has grown, shrunk and now is regrowing again stronger then ever. Most of this clan is involved with a game called Counter Strike: Condition Zero (CS:CZ) but now this clan is quickly growing in the Guild Wars realm (GW) with clan and non-clan members alike.
Clan Heavy Metal promotes clean gaming… no cussing or adult content is allowed on any of is servers. WE pride ourselves of being family orientated and a close knit group. So close, that even though we are spread around the United States, we not only talk in the game or on Ventrillo… but talk on AIM, Skype and even on the phone. So unlike most groups that last maybe a year or two… this Clan has stood strong for years and awaits a decade of service to the gaming community.
In Guild Wars Game, nothing is different with the way we play and treat others. We will help those that need a little extra for a quest and welcome those with a good personality to be a member of our not just clan… but family. We use Ventrillo to communicate with each other in game to coordinate attacks in battle, missions and Seering runs. We have 3 more members getting the game as we speak and we hope to find all of you on here from some good gaming and trading. Please visit us on our Clan Heavy Metal Website. Take care and happy hunting!
]HM[ Sabre Wolf Clan Heavy Metal Guild Wars Tag: [HM]
Hi[edit]
You're not allowed to blank talk pages. --63.227.13.231 19:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- I will [unsigned] if its voilating a Copyright Agreement, which it is, on my own Guild created page. The logo, ]HM[, is Copyrighted for its use as a logo for Clan Heavy Metal... the unsigned user is intentionally violating that agreement. Therefore, I would be allowed to delete that post correct? SabreWolf 19:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- The only policy that I can find that might have import here says that the only way copyright content can be included on userpages is if it's released under the GNU Free Documentation License. The guild pages policy says nothing. --63.227.13.231 19:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi[edit]
Seriously, do you need to add a comment on the talk page for every single skill that was changed last update? Whoru? Misery 15:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- is there a problem with this? I believe the discussion tab is there to DISCUSS the SKILLS... so I am not understanding your little injunction here... and as for who I am... I am the guy that does the Video Game Coverage of the mAT which gets posted on GuildWars.com - SabreWolf 16:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Actually it's not there to discuss the skills at all. See this wiki is for documenting the game. Discussion usually occurs on forums. Misery 16:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not meaning to argue... but if its not for discussing purposes, then why do you allow the same people to flame in the discussion areas all the time? What I am writing are objective responses to my analysis of the change. I am not sure how this is an issue, but yet you let others spam QQ all over the pages that are not objective and are actually demeening to the ANET/NCSoft companies on a Game integrated site. So what I am writing/doing is not even close to that non-sense that others are doing Misery... Heck I seem to be the only one saying that WE (PvP) is a revert, not a nerf, which should be documented. I am being very objective, so I am not sure how this is an issue. - SabreWolf 16:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Firstly, I don't allow or disallow anyone to do anything. Secondly, my objection comes from you making seemingly random comments with no apparent value such as your comment on Talk:Illusionary Weaponry and because it seems you are just going to every updated skill page to add something regardless of whether or not you have anything to say. I'm basically asking that you think about what you want to say and if you actually have a comment to make, go ahead and make it, but do you really need to spam every updated skill page? Misery 16:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not meaning to argue... but if its not for discussing purposes, then why do you allow the same people to flame in the discussion areas all the time? What I am writing are objective responses to my analysis of the change. I am not sure how this is an issue, but yet you let others spam QQ all over the pages that are not objective and are actually demeening to the ANET/NCSoft companies on a Game integrated site. So what I am writing/doing is not even close to that non-sense that others are doing Misery... Heck I seem to be the only one saying that WE (PvP) is a revert, not a nerf, which should be documented. I am being very objective, so I am not sure how this is an issue. - SabreWolf 16:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Actually it's not there to discuss the skills at all. See this wiki is for documenting the game. Discussion usually occurs on forums. Misery 16:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
