User talk:The Great Tomato/Resolved Issues
redirects
Please don't add redirects from the main namespace to the Guild: namespace, see GWW:GUILD. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 16:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, we would like that page (that i think you mean (http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/The_Imperial_Guards_Alliance)) deleted as it was a mistake, and only afterwards did we realise that we couldnt delete it, so I had to put it back Sorry for any inconvienience caused. The Great Tomato 16:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Blanking this talk page
As noted in GWW:USER#User talk page restrictions, please don't blank the content of this talk page. You can archive it if you wish to do so, but please don't just simply remove any messages from it. Thanks! --Dirigible 20:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
an abbreviation
Just thought I'd mention, a lot of us just put "RV" as the reason (short for "revert") if we're just rolling back a page edit. Save time. :) (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 23:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Lockpicks and base chance of regaining keys
Every "normal" chest has a chance of regaining a lockpick if opened with lockpick (in normal mode). There is a base rate + the chance you personally have with your title achievments. See Talk:Lockpick#Bonus for normal mode for my (first) research shortly after hardmode release. Compared to Kournan/Vabbi Chests Luxon/Kurzick chests should have 30% bonus, Canthan 35%. Can't check this ingame today... - MSorglos (talk|contrib) 19:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Okay then the statement which i removed earlier today (was slightly incorrect as it did not specify that it was only for Normal Mode) The Great Tomato 19:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Tagging guild pages with {{inactive guild}}
I suggest you read up on this: Guild Wars Wiki_talk:Guild pages#Regularly changing information. -- (CoRrRan / talk) 14:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- hurrah! So it's now 6 months but the template hasnt been updated -.- why did no-one do this? At least you stopped me now at 35 guilds before i went through the entire list :P The Great Tomato 14:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hehe, you're welcome :)
- The template hasn't been updated yet, since the consensus hasn't been entirely reached yet. I guess this one just slipped a bit. I would suggest to stop adding the inactivity-tag and perhaps give your input on that link I gave you. The faster the modification reaches cosensus, the quicker we can change the inactivity-tag. -- (CoRrRan / talk) 14:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
User image deletion
When you tag an user image for deletion, could you please also notify the uploader of the deletion? That way, the user will know why it disappeared and also know how to name images in the future. For both their and our convenience :) Thank you! - anja 20:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)