User talk:TitusFFX
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Archive
Hey, not really sure what you did, but could you go ahead and... Undo it? Thanks. — Raine Valen 
3:34, 27 Oct 2010 (UTC)
I've been given permission to remove all aspects of my account to prepair it to be resigned *deleted*. I'll be using the main account for further use. TitusFFX 03:40, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Erm... you haven't been given permission to do anything of the sort. -Auron 03:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello[edit]
I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to do, though I believe you wish to request that your costumes suggestion is deleted. Moving pages to inappropriate places, is not going to accomplish that. If you want something deleted, please tag it with {{delete|U1|speedy}}. Thanks! -- Wyn 
talk 04:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry I've already requested Support from the main team from a few unwanted that have been harrasing ingame and on here.
- ArenaNet and NCSoft support has nothing to do with the wiki, other than hosting it. If you want something done here, you have to request it of the admins. Support is not going to delete your wiki account. -- Wyn
talk 04:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have requested Justin ro remove it since the lower ranks only further worsen the cause before it comes a law suit of personal slandary claims.
- The Guild Wars Wiki IT team. Since the issue is ingame also and none of the standard team will do anything. (I just want the posts deleted not the entire account)
- The only time I use the NcSoft Support is when the problem moves to ingame and one of the people have already been terminated for fairly heavy abuse. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:TitusFFX (talk).
- Well, in game reports to support are for game behavior, they have nothing to do with the wiki. The wiki is monitored and run by the community. The rules that apply here are our Policies, not the game EULA. The people who deal with policy violations on the wiki are the GWW:ADMINS. You can request their assistance by placing a notice on the Admin Noticeboard. -- Wyn talk 13:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Well, in game reports to support are for game behavior, they have nothing to do with the wiki. The wiki is monitored and run by the community. The rules that apply here are our Policies, not the game EULA. The people who deal with policy violations on the wiki are the GWW:ADMINS. You can request their assistance by placing a notice on the Admin Noticeboard. -- Wyn
- Oh then I'll have Salome do it since he's a friend of mine ingame anyways since the previous changes keep being reverted from one or 2 that have been telling my ingame names so they can bring the conversation out of this site. *keep in mind that once it leaves this site there is no immunity to your own policies* TitusFFX 13:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Harassment[edit]
Hi. You stated you were being harassed in-game and on the wiki as a response to you posting a feedback suggestion. While we can't do anything about stuff in-game I would like to know where you were harassed on-wiki and by whom. If you were being harassed here, I'm sure we can figure something out to at least make the harassment on-wiki stop. If you were just being overly sensitive about a discussion regarding an idea you posted though I fear we can't do much about it. Discussion are what discussion pages are for. So yeah, if you have a problem with a specific user or edit please link them so that I can help you out here.
Also I'm not entirely sure who you contacted of the Guild Wars Wiki IT team but I doubt they can/will help you, since they don't actually run the public side of the wiki, just the technical server side. — Why
14:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure who exactly is the one who started it but I've found mulitple people ingame talking about it and when they saw me come online... well I have no way to avoid it since most everyone already knows my main accounts and TitusFFX is my main google name I use for my reviewing agencies. My character names back when I was in the top 10 gvg are posted there back from a few years ago. Ansa Shouei I've had trouble with a while back but that was resolved fairly quickly. One of the others that was multi-logging one of the GS team members found him themselves and send me a message saying they have been terminated for violation of conduct policy. *name will not be disclosed do to privacy policy, however the alternate account ingame name I'm able to give since it doesn't give the actual wiki user name "Zaar Wind Blade".
- I would rather much just have the last post of the Costumes in PvP removed due to talk page has become more of a blog and no longer relevant to the topic and becoming far out of hand. The previous topics "other: then my own personal My Talk page under discussion remains under normal operation and may be kept. However I would like to reset the My talk page and set up a proper HMTL work space since for some reason Auron likes to revert my own changes to a page I've been given power of changing as many time as I wish. *Autoconfirmed Users* TitusFFX 19:40, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- There seems to be a misunderstanding here. While your talk page is "yours" in the sense that people may use it to communicate with you, it belongs to the community as a whole and must follow the policies of the wiki. That means that posts will not be deleted and, as far as I can see, Auron was right to revert you. If you want to remove a comment you can do so but only by moving it to an archive after the discussion has ended.
- About the names you mentioned, that's ingame and not something we wiki-folks can do something about. About the talk page of your suggestion page, well, if people disagree with you they're perfectly allowed to voice their opinion. They're discussing your suggestion and the topic your suggestion is about and the talk page of your suggestion is a perfect place to do so. Also about the supposed "bad language", we have a policy against personal attacks. If on the other hand people want to use a dramatic tone to discuss your suggestion there's nothing stopping them. Don't be offended if people disagree with your suggestion. If you really want people not to discuss your suggestion, you might consider not posting suggestions (or having them deleted). — Why
20:56, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- About the names you mentioned, that's ingame and not something we wiki-folks can do something about. About the talk page of your suggestion page, well, if people disagree with you they're perfectly allowed to voice their opinion. They're discussing your suggestion and the topic your suggestion is about and the talk page of your suggestion is a perfect place to do so. Also about the supposed "bad language", we have a policy against personal attacks. If on the other hand people want to use a dramatic tone to discuss your suggestion there's nothing stopping them. Don't be offended if people disagree with your suggestion. If you really want people not to discuss your suggestion, you might consider not posting suggestions (or having them deleted). — Why
- However by policy you always allow pages to be deleted at creators descretion if it no longer is relevent text being entered pertaining to the topic. And that is why I would like it to be removed since it's no longer a relevent topic. The language issue wasn't really a problem at first then a few had very bad mouths putting near half of all text entered was inapproate for any age and is not nessasary to help explain anything logical in the game or of the topic. Do to my work schedual as a RN I will no longer be able to update this conversation anymore since It's becoming too much work for a common daily task. TitusFFX
- We allow content pages to be deleted at sole editor's request, and user pages to be deleted at user request. The latter applies to user Feedback pages too, however it does not cover talk pages as those will only ever be deleted if their associated page has been deleted and there is no relevant information to be stored. I hope this was insightful. — Why 22:15, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- We allow content pages to be deleted at sole editor's request, and user pages to be deleted at user request. The latter applies to user Feedback pages too, however it does not cover talk pages as those will only ever be deleted if their associated page has been deleted and there is no relevant information to be stored. I hope this was insightful. — Why
- Well as of the Topic of Costumes in Pvp, If you kind of notice after the first paragraph or so it completely changed from the topic to something not related to the original post and futher ventured into areas of topic that are completely unrelated to anything listed on the original post. That is why I said it was better off that it should be removed since it has become a blog as you may have noticed one of the comments further down the page saying they was going to save the page so they can come back to laugh about the conversation that was passed back and forth between me an multiple synops that really should know better than to stray that far off topic. *one of which was even banned from talking on any admin page if you noticed their talk page* TitusFFX 22:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Shard isn't a SysOp (I think that's what you mean by synop.. a full list can be found here) and Adrin's comment is the type of trolling comment that you are allowed to remove. King Neoterikos 23:01, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- In fact the only sysop that commented on that page was Auron, who kept to the subject of your suggestion and the discussion it sparked. I don't see how the page has become a "blog" of some sorts. Also Shard hasn't been banned from editing admin pages, just certain Anet employee pages. Anyway, this discussion is leading nowhere so let's drop it. If you have any questions on how this wiki operates, who is who, or other things like that, feel free to visit my talk page, I'd gladly help out, and if you want me to delete your suggestion page just tag it for deletion. Thanks. — Why 23:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- In fact the only sysop that commented on that page was Auron, who kept to the subject of your suggestion and the discussion it sparked. I don't see how the page has become a "blog" of some sorts. Also Shard hasn't been banned from editing admin pages, just certain Anet employee pages. Anyway, this discussion is leading nowhere so let's drop it. If you have any questions on how this wiki operates, who is who, or other things like that, feel free to visit my talk page, I'd gladly help out, and if you want me to delete your suggestion page just tag it for deletion. Thanks. — Why
- Shard isn't a SysOp (I think that's what you mean by synop.. a full list can be found here) and Adrin's comment is the type of trolling comment that you are allowed to remove. King Neoterikos 23:01, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Well as of the Topic of Costumes in Pvp, If you kind of notice after the first paragraph or so it completely changed from the topic to something not related to the original post and futher ventured into areas of topic that are completely unrelated to anything listed on the original post. That is why I said it was better off that it should be removed since it has become a blog as you may have noticed one of the comments further down the page saying they was going to save the page so they can come back to laugh about the conversation that was passed back and forth between me an multiple synops that really should know better than to stray that far off topic. *one of which was even banned from talking on any admin page if you noticed their talk page* TitusFFX 22:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
