Feedback talk:User/Gorth/Let GWAMM repeat unrepeatable Quests

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Not a bad idea however some of the rewards might have to change, there are a few fairly easy quests that give trade contracts in vabbi that can be traded for rubi's and sapphires these would be farmed if they could be done a limitless number of times. Might be wrong was a while ago but i am pretty sure theres one that gives a rubi as reward somewhere so yeah balance the rewards so you still get fair exp and gold and i would be all for this. --Dinsy User Ros Sig.png 11:56, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

I like it as well since it can keep people who have completed the game ocupied with some nostalgia. But like Dinsy said rewards would need to be changed into xp only, the quests that reward with skills in prophecies can stay as it doesn't hurt the game. Da Mystic Reaper 20:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Not even exp rewards only towards quests that are being repeated because it'll contribute greatly to the survivor track (which is easy enough as is). This idea is pretty weak though, only has SOME purposes.--Eclipse143 04:26, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
And survivor would matter for those who have achieved GWAMM? 99% of those who have achieved GWAMM probably have obtained survivor already and those who have not it would not matter at all since it would be nothing more than prestige to have it (not that survivor has any prestige left). And the purpose you can find in it is to keep players ocupied by reliving old stuff, it can also be used to assist players with quests they have already done since the log and quest marker show what to do and where to go. It has practical uses and allows to kill time for those who have completed PvE. And for those who look for a challenge redoing the quests of WiK, WoC and the HM quests. Da Mystic Reaper 14:31, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
sorry, but for me this is useless! with much more necessary updates to come, i doubt anyone really needs this one! --The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.146.137.76 (talk).