File talk:Jora.jpg

One day Santax will decide which image he want's of Jora :) --Lemming 17:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Lol, I think the in-game render one is the nicest :P --Santax (talk · contribs) 08:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

which one is that? The one where she is standing against a grey background or the one where she is waving her sword in the air? :) EDIT: oops just reverted it again by accident xD don't worry I reverted it back :P --Alien 12:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop reverting. The grey background image is the clearest and shows Jora's in-game model the best. Arshay Duskbrow 21:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Why don't you just put both pictures on Jora's page and stop this ridiculous reversion war --Primeval 00:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Reluctantly done, since Santax can't seem to stop; that picture is hideous though, and I'd prefer not to include it at all. Arshay Duskbrow 03:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

The "pixelated pose" is the type of render we've been using across all hero articles, at least until Emily can upload proper ones. Renders are much preferred to anything with a background; they simply look nicer within the page. We even have a huge render project going on. Imo, we should use the smaller render (which, incidentally, comes from an official source: the NCTaiwan manual, not some fansite) until Emily can upload a larger one. --Santax (talk · contribs) 09:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

It's not about using one picture over the other on principle, it's about which is better quality. Until we have such a high-quality render as you describe, we should use the most detailed, clearest picture available, which is the one with the grey background at present. Arshay Duskbrow 09:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

But it's booooooooooooooring D:

Since it doesn't look like we're going to come to an agreement on this, maybe we should ask for an external opinion? --Santax (talk · contribs) 09:31, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

(Reset) Considering you tried the same thing on Guildwiki, I suggest looking at http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Talk:Jora to see what some other people thought, at the bottom. Arshay Duskbrow 09:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

You mean this? That is what I would consider a high-quality render of Jora, not dissimilar to the ones on the pages we have on Devona and Cynn, and yet it was reverted, recieving ignorant comments such as those. In fact, it's something like that we should be using on the page. --Santax (talk · contribs) 09:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

No, those comments were in reference to the sword picture you are championing, and it's interesting that their comments are "ignorant" merely by virtue of not agreeing with your own opinions. Arshay Duskbrow 10:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

I can find no such image having ever been used on that page. --Santax (talk · contribs) 10:02, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Could you two just calm down a bit?
Personally, I prefer the picture with the grey background, as it shows Jora in the best way. In both the pictures with the swords, Jora gets less focus and even gets small to make room for the sword. I don't like that. - anja 10:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Well said. Arshay Duskbrow 10:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

What about puting a white background on this one? Chriskang 11:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

That's a compromise I'm willing to accept :) --Santax (talk · contribs) 11:01, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Lovely Criskang, I like that one :) - anja 11:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)