Talk:Warrior Primeval armor
From Guild Wars Wiki
Its nice, but i hate the boots on the male version. I didn't really pay attention to it until i bought the set... now i regret getting the boots. Female version looks better for sure.--PimpC1125 00:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Okay, does anyone else notice that the arm on the left of the male set looks WAY too small? I dont mean to be sexist or anything, but on all the other armors the male arms are bigger than the female arms.--72.223.77.197 00:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- It does...It's like atrophic or something. I really like the male boots though. I'm going to get them when I get my warrior this far. xP 72.81.247.139 02:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- I think this looks like a very nice armor set, but im not a big fan of the helmet, but i guess i could just dye the armor a dark purple (like the tormented weapons "glowing patterns")and put on a blindfold. this is probably the best looking primeval armor, followed by the mesmer. Valion Sentis 00:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- The 'atrophic' effect of the arm might be because that's the dominant arm and would hold a sword or axe. The smaller armor means less metal and less weight allowing for the person to swing their weapon harder. If you look at any video game, and some photos of historical armor, the dominant hand or arm has less 'protection' because of the fact that, that's the arm the weapon goes in. Anyway my two sense is that I don't like the warrior primeval, but that's just me... Arty 23:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think this looks like a very nice armor set, but im not a big fan of the helmet, but i guess i could just dye the armor a dark purple (like the tormented weapons "glowing patterns")and put on a blindfold. this is probably the best looking primeval armor, followed by the mesmer. Valion Sentis 00:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

