User:Nataliexxx/Archive2NosPage

Guild Cape Image

Guild cape needs updating. Unreal Havoc 14:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Lots of stuff needs updating. 88.104.73.3

Complaint

I tried to register for an account on the kissalliance.net website, but after 4 hours I still haven't gotten a registration email. And yes, I whitelisted the website for my email account, so the message wouldn't get blocked.

I recently did 2 Underworld runs with a member of your alliance named Memphis The Healer. I paid for both the runs; I didn't have a problem with that. On the first run, only one ecto dropped and it was for me. On the second run, 4 ectos dropped for Memphis, and he did not share even one with me -- in fact, after finishing the run, he logged out immediately.

I'm not sure if the leaders of your alliance will take any action against this person, or if anyone will even see this message. But I will be notifying everyone in my alliance, and everyone in ToA when I log in, that your alliance has untrustworthy, unscrupulous members. 76.248.5.154 19:04, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I can assure you that any untrustworthy members are dealt with quickly and descively. I happen to think that it was just bad luck you didn't get any ectos, it happens sometimes. If, however, you did pay, you should be entitled to at least your moneys back, although I am not sure that Steve and James will also take this PoV. 88.104.73.3

I'm not sure whether this is really a topic of discussion suitable for the wiki, but to give you some assurance, you may be happy to know that the person you referred to is no longer a member of the [KISS] Alliance guilds.--Bunny - Angel talk 10:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Updated

I noticed that the page wasn't compliant with the changes in Guild Pages Policy so I have made corrections where necessary, as well as updating the cape and banner information and updated our content to be more current. It was probably long overdue for a clean up anyway so the policy changes have stopped my procrastinating at long last :) --Bunny - Angel talk 10:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Objection to deletion (atm)

Like I already wrote in answer to Prepared to Burn on my talk page I think this deletion might be too fast. The guild is still there and it's not up to Bunny nor me to decide what will happen with it. We have both clearly stated on our talk pages that we don't have all the information about it. Like I already mentioned on my talk page I think you (in general, not directed to Prepared to Burn) should first contact someone from the guild itself before you put it up for deletion. I'm not totally up to date with the policy around guilds, but I read somewhere that guilds will be put in an archive once their page has not been edited for 6 months. It seems to me that KISS Is part of the GW history, for that reason it would be nice to not delete it (of course if that is not against the GWwiki policy). -- Pepper - Dewdrop talk 19:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I do not agree with this deletion. I was never a member of this guild even when I was in the alliance, so I cannot confirm if the guild exists or not. The rumors of disbanding have been in discussion for the past week, however the owner of the guild should be the one to verify if he has disbanded it or not. This deletion is far too fast in my opinion and has not been verified independently. --Bunny - Angel talk 19:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I have researched this issue and I do believe that marking this guild for deletion is incorrect and inconsistent with the wiki policy for Guild Pages. The policy page clearly states that a guild should be marked as a {{historical guild}} if it has disbanded, not deleted. Either way, whether this guild has disbanded or not has not been confirmed. --Bunny - Angel talk 19:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

There are certainly no rumours involved.While Nosferatu,Gods,Torment and Order still exist it is only temporarily.Those [KISS] guilds are in the new alliance under James until such times that they are emptied and members have trickled into the new alliance/have parted company and went their separate ways.The reasoning for the disbanding of [KISS]and further discussion of,I will leave off wiki.This isn't the place

From what i can understand,these guild pages should indeed be tagged as historical and not removed

[SiCK] (formerly [KISS]) Alliance Manager BlackBlood - talk 20:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I have moved this page to Historical. If this is not correct, please let me know, and I will move it back. If the other guilds in the alliance are being disbanded as they are absorbed into the new alliance, please have the primary editors note that on their talk pages and they will also be moved to Historical guild status. Thanks! -- Wyn 21:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you Wynthyst,I'll update the rest when the guilds have been disbanded BlackBlood - talk 21:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

So what guild is James under now? This SiCK one? He doesnt seem to be active at all, and neither do the officers. --Burning Freebies 17:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

The whereabouts of James and the activity of himself and his officers coupled with the status of [SiCK] or anything closely relevant isn't up for discussion on this wiki.Anyway,it's on a "need to know basis"BlackBlood - talk 17:38, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Youre right, if anything is should be brought up in game or something like that, just not on a wiki. Lets just leave KISS as disbanded (believed to be anyway). If James actually spoke to us about it it would help. --Burning Freebies 20:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Its james here, I am only here to state that kiss of Nosferatu still exists along with several other guilds. the status of this will not change without my say so. wiki will be the first to know about kiss guilds disbanded as for burning freebies you are only more than happy to watch kiss burn like you have stated several times in the past "hence the reason for you being so Eager to take down wiki pages that are none of your business. please keep you conflicts with kiss to yourself and go bark up another tree. as for applying for Sysop burning they would be mad to accept some 14 year old terror like yourself.. enough said. thanks for everyone elses support on kiss in the past, present and comming future. Disaproval 23:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, all the KISS guilds have been moved to historical status on the wiki as they were all noted to be disbanded. -- Wyn 23:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

That will be correct to add them to historical, its fine by me and for the record the guild of nosferatu still exists although it will be inactive for recruiting. thanks for yourtime wynthyst.Disaproval 23:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Ooooh, James just made broke the NPA rule. Im telling a sysop. --Burning Freebies 15:55, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

hi. its james the owner/creator of the [KISS] alliance. and [SiCk] alliance. kiss is back on tour. is it possible to have it remove from the historical section of wiki? i quoted earlier kiss was never disbanded but it was moved to the historical section of wiki becuase of some people being to quick to judge. after a break from guildwars im back to the game.. please ammend this historical issue thank you. Disaproval 20:16, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah nice to read this James, welcome back ;) As you can see in the Guild Policy you can just untag it. It says: "Users may only remove the {{historical guild}} tag if the guild is in fact still in existence." So it shouldn't be any problem if you just edit it and remove the tag (someone correct me if I'm wrong ;)). Have fun! -- Pepper - Dewdrop talk 01:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

pveeeeeeeeeeeedramaaaaaaaaa -Auron 01:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

It actually needed to be moved back to the original location, but I have done that. If the rest of the alliance pages also need to be restored please leave me a note on my talk page and I will take care of it. -- Wyn 09:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Affiliated with the cats?

64.222.106.112 02:05, 26 November 2009 (UTC)