User talk:Dark Morphon
From Guild Wars Wiki
Hello, Dark Morphon, and welcome to the Official Guild Wars Wiki! If you need help with anything, don't hesitate to add a message to my talk page. I highly recommend that you check out the "Welcome to the wiki" page - it's extremely useful as an initial guide. Best of luck and happy editing! — ク Eloc 貢 17:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thx a lot :P. Dark Morphon 09:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Re:
Many people complained about Anet not having an official forum. If they do, it would end up like this, full of trash-talkers. This is why they don't have an official forum, but wiki seems to operates like one. Readem have committed multiple personal attacks on this wiki and is given multiple warnings. I told the admin to ban him multiple times, but it didn't happen. It only show this wiki is lame if he doesn't get banned, and it only shows how lame this wiki is when trash-talkers get worshiped like hero. Lightblade 17:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Then still, why do u say if Ilike Readem I should be banned? It's not really fair is it? Did I break any rules? Dark Morphon 09:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh and Readem is cool cuz he dares to challenge teh doods here. Dark Morphon 09:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- No way, Raptors has messed with the people here alot more than anyone else. — ク Eloc 貢 20:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well I don't really care, if all the ppl here are like Lightblade then this site does fail. Dark Morphon 16:43, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- No way, Raptors has messed with the people here alot more than anyone else. — ク Eloc 貢 20:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- You just did. Calling me fail is a personal attack. That's enough to be given a warning from sysops. If you continue to do so, it's a ban. Lightblade 20:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not quite sure it's considered a personal attack, but what I've seen before, it can definitely be taken as a personal attack. — ク Eloc 貢 00:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Then why does he say things like he said? That's a bit hypocritical if you ask me. Dark Morphon 14:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not quite sure it's considered a personal attack, but what I've seen before, it can definitely be taken as a personal attack. — ク Eloc 貢 00:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh and Readem is cool cuz he dares to challenge teh doods here. Dark Morphon 09:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Quiet here
Is any1 gonneh say something or what? Dark Morphon 14:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Mirrored Stance --Cursed Angel
14:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Woo a reaction :D. Dark Morphon 14:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- so lol, its pretty quiet here right? --Cursed Angel
14:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yeh except for the "LOL I BAN U NUB" messages xD Dark Morphon 14:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- heh, lightblade fail alot sometimes, even tho i dont know him --Cursed Angel
14:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- All he can say is U LEIK READEM?! U MUST BE BANNED LULZ! rly stupid Dark Morphon 14:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- heh, lightblade fail alot sometimes, even tho i dont know him --Cursed Angel
- Yeh except for the "LOL I BAN U NUB" messages xD Dark Morphon 14:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- so lol, its pretty quiet here right? --Cursed Angel
- Woo a reaction :D. Dark Morphon 14:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GWW:USER & GWW:NPA
Wow, you must have skills to violate 2 policys at once ([1]). Anyways, no removing comments (at all) in order to make a personal attack. — ク Eloc 貢 06:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- ...What? If I deleted a comment then sorry it wasn't intential but Ididn't violate NPA, unless u take the name of that policy a bit too literally xD... Dark Morphon 09:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Or is "scaring" some1 by saying boo considered a personal attack?? I don't think so. Dark Morphon 12:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- What I meant is you removed
== http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70kw3GZmKRE ==
in order to make it look like Zinc's unsigned comment was calling Cursed Angel gay. — ク Eloc 貢 03:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)- As I said, if I removed something it wasn't intential. I know how the things work here and I'm not stupid so I won't do that on purpose. Dark Morphon 12:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- What I meant is you removed
- Or is "scaring" some1 by saying boo considered a personal attack?? I don't think so. Dark Morphon 12:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] (ineligible to vote, must have more than 100 edits before December 13)
Sadly, you're a bit short on edits when it comes to non-talk and -guild pages... you'll have to edit more here so you can vote next election. Might I suggest skill pages? GuildWiki has all sorts of usage notes and things like related skills, but GWW is short on most of that. Adding related skills and whatnot could easily break a hundred edits. :P
Oh, and heya BTW. Nifty to see you here. --
Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 09:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Awww, what a pity :(. Well it just means I have to contribute a bit more for the next round ^^. Dark Morphon 09:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- yah theres another of these election things in two months or something --Cursed Angel
09:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- W00t I'm going to participate in these elections and you'll see, I WILL win!!! Dark Morphon 09:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- heh, then you'll have to make urself known here and make alot of helpful things, but you'll have my vote anyway :D --Cursed Angel
09:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yeh I'm gonne be nice to every1, even that Lightblade guy and then I will rule the world! Dark Morphon 09:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- If being nice to people = world domination, then I should already own you by now! How much longer must I endure my wonderful people skills?! --
Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 11:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, my logic is flawed ofc. Dark Morphon 12:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- If being nice to people = world domination, then I should already own you by now! How much longer must I endure my wonderful people skills?! --
- Yeh I'm gonne be nice to every1, even that Lightblade guy and then I will rule the world! Dark Morphon 09:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- heh, then you'll have to make urself known here and make alot of helpful things, but you'll have my vote anyway :D --Cursed Angel
- W00t I'm going to participate in these elections and you'll see, I WILL win!!! Dark Morphon 09:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- yah theres another of these election things in two months or something --Cursed Angel
[edit] Your signature image
It is currently in violation of the image policy please reupload it under a name like "User Dark Morphon sig.jpg. Lyra Valo
12:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't? Wait a sec I'll do it straight away.
Dark Morphon(contribs) 13:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] SHINZO
Spam much? Chiyu 22:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- That's from aaaaages ago, just ignore it, I did so too. Dark Morphon(contribs) 07:31, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Yessir! Chiyu! 14:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hi
Hi there, I noticed you have been posting some comments on our bcrat election pages; while we love to here feedback on canidates GWW:ELECT makes it to where you are not supposed to make comments on the voting page. If you would like you may make your comments on the talk page. Thanks :o) --Shadowphoenix
06:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh ok lolz, didn't notice. Thanks for pointing it out. Dark Morphon(contribs) 11:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reasoning
Saying "you're bad at X" doesn't mean anything unless you back it up. You can try again when you grow up. ~Shard (talk) 22:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- shard ure baed --Cursed Angel
22:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- well he's right kinda —Zerpha
The Improver 22:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- well he's right kinda —Zerpha
- Want me to come with reasoning? Then reasoning you get! Dark Morphon(contribs) 08:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oh btw, you're really, REALLY bad shard. Dark Morphon(contribs) 11:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm also the King of England. Grow up, kid. 72.235.48.41 04:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- No you and get an account. Dark Morphon(contribs) 16:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oooo, it's you shard guy. Sorry lol. Btw, srsly. You don't seem to have an answer to my criticism do you? Doesn't make me that "winner of the discussion"? Dark Morphon(contribs) 16:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm also the King of England. Grow up, kid. 72.235.48.41 04:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] STOP IT
STOP FLAMING ME :'(
bored..
Oni 16:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- I DINDT BIATCH! GIMME PROFF! Dark Morphon(contribs) 11:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- STP FLAEMIN DEM PPL HEER UR SUSH A TROOL --Cursed Angel
11:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- SES WOH? TEH CRSUD ANGIL? UR SUSH A TROOL URSILF! Dark Morphon(contribs) 11:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- STP FLAEMIN DEM PPL HEER UR SUSH A TROOL --Cursed Angel
Happy ending? :DOni 14:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- No u! Dark Morphon(contribs) 14:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC) (srsly wut r u tokkin bout).
Stp flemmin me and supportin mudkipz! mudkipz are baed kittenhuntahsOni 15:32, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- BlindingPowderBomb on you*
[edit] sper.
YUSH,wtb ur f00ken sper. o.oOni
18:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] [2]
So stop it, tbh. :/ -- Armond Warblade
16:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- No u! Dark Morphon(contribs) 07:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC) (Don't bother me on my talk page plz).
[edit] MOAR SPAM BITCHIZ
I DUNT EVEN HAVE AN ARCHIVE, SPAM MOAR FOR LOLZ FACTOR! Dark Morphon(contribs) 12:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC) (do use minor edit tho cuz else u get banned)
HA! oniz talkpaegz iz liek bettrar dan morhpzOni
22:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- YE AND I HATE TET. Dark Morphon(contribs) 14:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] fuxxrar
leafing uz in TA!? :'(Oni
17:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeye sorry parentspikd n all. Dark Morphon(contribs) 17:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Guild
We got a full core team established now. be active more bitch so we can gvgOni
12:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm on pretty often, how is that not active? But i'll try to get on ASAP. Dark Morphon(contribs) 14:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
we pawnd em =DDOni
21:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ownage was ours indeed. Again today? Dark Morphon(contribs) 06:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- 15:30 was his idea or 16 Fox007
13:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'll get on right now. Dark Morphon(contribs) 13:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- 15:30 was his idea or 16 Fox007
[edit] /(x-x)
phail. - Y0_ich_halt
17:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Which is zero :D. Dark Morphon(contribs) 12:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- I mean, divide by zero. Anyway. It sort of proves 0/0 can't be one. Dark Morphon(contribs) 12:42, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- nah, it proves 0/0 can be done. and it also proves that results from such calculations are not reliable anymore :D so you gotta watch out you don't accidentally divide by zero in calculations with many variables. - Y0_ich_halt
17:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, yeah. Because basically it says (0/0)x2=(0x2)/0 which is not true. Which is where it goes wrong. Dark Morphon(contribs) 17:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Image:User Y0 ich halt divzero.gif - Y0_ich_halt
17:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Red link? O_O Dark Morphon(contribs) 17:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- link upload. - Y0_ich_halt
17:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oic. Btw, 1/0 is infinity and so is 2/0 etc. Dark Morphon(contribs) 18:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- phail. x/0 = WTF? you cannot divide by 0--Sum Mesmer Guy
contribs 18:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- What happens when you divide 1 by 0.1? It becomes 10 right? So what happens when you divide by 0.0000000(infinite 0s)1? Yep, you get infinity. And as we all know, 0.9999999... is 1, so 0.0000000....001 is 0. Explanation received and understood sir? Dark Morphon(contribs) 19:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- right, first of all, 0.9999999... only = 1 if the 9s go on forever. 0.0000000....0001 must therefore not exist because if you have infinite zeros, where can the 1 go. you're dealing with impossible numbers (fun fact: the squareroot of -1 = i, and the squareroot of -25 = 5i)--Sum Mesmer Guy
contribs 20:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- I know about i, what has it to do with this matter? Anyway, infinity is an impossible number, so why wouldn't this be true? Dark Morphon(contribs) 07:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- infinity isn't a number, whereas you've come up with the completely hypothetical number 0.00000...00001--Sum Mesmer Guy
contribs 08:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Since when is infinity not a number? Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:07, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Also, 1-0.999999999999999.... is zero right? And you can also write that as 0.000000.......001 right? So 1/0 = infinity. Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- infinity isn't a number, whereas you've come up with the completely hypothetical number 0.00000...00001--Sum Mesmer Guy
- I know about i, what has it to do with this matter? Anyway, infinity is an impossible number, so why wouldn't this be true? Dark Morphon(contribs) 07:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- right, first of all, 0.9999999... only = 1 if the 9s go on forever. 0.0000000....0001 must therefore not exist because if you have infinite zeros, where can the 1 go. you're dealing with impossible numbers (fun fact: the squareroot of -1 = i, and the squareroot of -25 = 5i)--Sum Mesmer Guy
- What happens when you divide 1 by 0.1? It becomes 10 right? So what happens when you divide by 0.0000000(infinite 0s)1? Yep, you get infinity. And as we all know, 0.9999999... is 1, so 0.0000000....001 is 0. Explanation received and understood sir? Dark Morphon(contribs) 19:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- phail. x/0 = WTF? you cannot divide by 0--Sum Mesmer Guy
- Oic. Btw, 1/0 is infinity and so is 2/0 etc. Dark Morphon(contribs) 18:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- link upload. - Y0_ich_halt
- Red link? O_O Dark Morphon(contribs) 17:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Image:User Y0 ich halt divzero.gif - Y0_ich_halt
- Actually, yeah. Because basically it says (0/0)x2=(0x2)/0 which is not true. Which is where it goes wrong. Dark Morphon(contribs) 17:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- nah, it proves 0/0 can be done. and it also proves that results from such calculations are not reliable anymore :D so you gotta watch out you don't accidentally divide by zero in calculations with many variables. - Y0_ich_halt
(Reset indent) to clear this, x/0 is actually defined as an unallowed execution. you can say though, that for f(x)=1/x with x approaching 0 (i don't know what term is used for this in english), f(x) approaches infinite. the point is, x can never actually become 0, but the closer it moves to 0, the closer f(x) moves to infinity. not sure what it's called in english, but in german it's a "Definitionslücke", which i would translate a definition void. you haven't had much to do with functions, have you? - Y0_ich_halt
10:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well, that's a way of approaching it too. About the last line, whaddaya mean? Dark Morphon(contribs) 10:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- don't you do w:Function (mathematics) in school in america? in germany, students in gymnasium (somewhere between high school and college i think) have to do that stuff from grade 7 till abitur (~a-grades). - Y0_ich_halt
11:25, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Of course we do functions in the Netherlands, I'm not American FYI... Dark Morphon(contribs) 11:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- oh, well, your user page doesn't say anything about your nationality, so i assumed you're american ;) - Y0_ich_halt
11:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- PRobably cause of the bad jokes? :P.--The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Dark Morphon (talk).
- oh, well, your user page doesn't say anything about your nationality, so i assumed you're american ;) - Y0_ich_halt
- Of course we do functions in the Netherlands, I'm not American FYI... Dark Morphon(contribs) 11:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- don't you do w:Function (mathematics) in school in america? in germany, students in gymnasium (somewhere between high school and college i think) have to do that stuff from grade 7 till abitur (~a-grades). - Y0_ich_halt
[edit] Aura of Faith
Healing Prayers: 10+1 Protection Prayers: 10+1+1 Divine Favor: 11+1
Aura of Faith, Healing Seed, Orison of Healing, Reversal of Fortune, Guardian, Cure Hex, Dismiss Condition, Rez (Doesn't matter what)
It's hard to make a build with no specific parameters. But, this can hold it's own in RA and can get in specific TA builds. You just use Aura of Faith on yourself and main dmg taking friend. Throw healing seed o nthat buddy when you need. Also, the Divine Favor will be slightly increased, and the health restored from Reversal of Fortune will more than make up for the damage it prevents. Then you got your basic condition and hex removals. Obviously, like most monk builds, excessive enchant stripping will kill this build, HOWEVER, because of the relatively low recharge compared to the duration, you can keep this on 4 people so it still has some good effects. This also works well in PvE where there are some, but not a ton of enchant strippers. FleshAndFaith 22:30, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, well, can be used. Still isn't very gud though. Dark Morphon(contribs) 08:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Also, in TA you will need a lot more hex removal because hexway is meta there. Dark Morphon(contribs) 08:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ok Then, but would you say this is decent? As for TA, you didn't say it had to be TA. If thats the case, then drop Healing Seed and bring Reverse Hex. Convert Hexes would also be a pretty good choice, if you are running into a lot of hexes and cover hexes that day. But, nothing beats a pre-veiler. Just a thought. As for anywhere else in the game, this runs pretty good. I ran a similar variant back when it was Prophecies only, and never had any complaints. FleshAndFaith 01:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- and ure still better of with healer's boon --Cursed Angel
01:14, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Unless you like to roll with a Resto Rit or Motivation Paragon, which I do. That way we get the benefit of Aura of Faith from OTHER HEALING SOURCES, quite like my argument in Aura Of Faith talk itself. Tah Dah. FleshAndFaith 02:58, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- You should really have the Spotless skill to deal with hexes. Dark Morphon(contribs) 10:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Unless you like to roll with a Resto Rit or Motivation Paragon, which I do. That way we get the benefit of Aura of Faith from OTHER HEALING SOURCES, quite like my argument in Aura Of Faith talk itself. Tah Dah. FleshAndFaith 02:58, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- and ure still better of with healer's boon --Cursed Angel
- Ok Then, but would you say this is decent? As for TA, you didn't say it had to be TA. If thats the case, then drop Healing Seed and bring Reverse Hex. Convert Hexes would also be a pretty good choice, if you are running into a lot of hexes and cover hexes that day. But, nothing beats a pre-veiler. Just a thought. As for anywhere else in the game, this runs pretty good. I ran a similar variant back when it was Prophecies only, and never had any complaints. FleshAndFaith 01:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
But that doesn;t help if you get hit with Migraine or something mean like that. Pre-veil and watch with Cure Hex. Cure hex isa pretty big heal. Cut it in half and add the original value, thats like 184, if I used the right value. FleshAndFaith 17:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- True, but you really need Spotless thingie to deal with the hexway that's meta. Migraine is not meta, so no real need in taking counters for it right? Dark Morphon(contribs) 18:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- To be fair, I didn't know I had to make a build to break the current meta. All I was doing was making a decent build that could hold it's own in PvE. As for the current meta, what hexes are prevalent? If they get on you, you're gonna need a way to get them off again. Spotless just doesn't do that. FleshAndFaith 21:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hi
Don't troll -- "lol nigger" isn't helpful in the least, and similar contributions may lead to a block. --
Brains12 \ talk 22:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, won't do it again. Dark Morphon(contribs) 11:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

