User talk:Misery

From Guild Wars Wiki

Contents 1 I finally ask 2 So like 3 deletion reasons 4 Thunderclap 5 It's like Alaska all over again! 6 Cleverbot.

[edit] I finally ask

Wtf is with the Misery fetish? Titani Ertan

Wtf are you talking about? Misery 17:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

It's because of his awesome user page. -- FreedomBound 17:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

I quote: "Misery's sexuality is sexy." "Misery is a sexual being." "Isn't Misery hot?" etc etc etc. You know exactly what I'm quoting about! Titani Ertan 17:45, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I guess I am quite sensual. Sorry, I'll try to be less so. Misery 17:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

You completely missed the point... and made mine clearer. Wtf? Titani Ertan 17:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

I think you may have missed my point. It's not something I control, you would have to ask the people who find me so. Misery 17:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

People who stalk Misery and are seeing this: Wtf? Titani Ertan 17:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

misery is sexy. I hear that the new Merriam-Webster will include the word mizzles. NuVII 18:04, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

I pleasure myself nightly to vent-recordings of Misery's soft-yet-manly voice. His accent always manages to get me going. ··· Danny Pew Pew 19:59, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

So, Titani: ur saying you can has no miserable yearnings? U not find such user sensually sexxxy? Not a sexual being? Unhot doubleminus? I think you doth protest too much.   — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 20:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

May I be the first to say, my dear sir, wat? ··· Danny Pew Pew 21:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Um... no? Titani Ertan 05:15, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I have an appointment. Is now good? ;o ---Chaos- (talk) -- 07:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

If you have an appointment, show up at your appointed time. Misery 07:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Good morning, Sunshine. is for Raine, etc. 07:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

You blocked me ;~; Misery 07:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

But I'm horny now :< ---Chaos- (talk) -- 07:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Being single sucks at 8am, doesn't it?

Also, you're not blocked. O.o is for Raine, etc. 08:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

What the hell... Can I not even see you online at home any more? Try sending me a message. Misery 08:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

...Oh. MSN crashed. I wonder how long ago that happened... is for Raine, etc. 08:51, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Days Raine, DAYS. Misery 08:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I thought maybe people had just stopped adoring me.  :\ is for Raine, etc. 08:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The day before you disappeared forever I had a few pages of:

Misery says: D:

The following message could not be delivered to all recipients:
D:

Misery says: D:

The following message could not be delivered to all recipients:
D:

Misery says: D:

The following message could not be delivered to all recipients:
D:

Misery says: D:

The following message could not be delivered to all recipients:
D:

Misery 09:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, it's nice to know I was missed. :D is for Raine, etc. 09:03, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

It's nice to know you didn't randomly start hating me :> Misery 09:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

If I hated you, I'd let you know in the most harmful way I could think of at the time. is for Raine, etc. 09:09, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Holy shit, I was not aware a number so much less than three existed. Misery 09:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I can has algebraic Absolute Zero? is for Raine, etc. 09:19, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Initially I was worried that would leave no room for improvement, that you had peaked. Then I realised that you defy the laws of mathematics. Misery 09:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

fix'd. is for Raine, etc. 10:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

MSN is that way ---->

-Auron 10:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Having issues with it crashing atm.

How are you doing on this fine, Hawaiian day? is for Raine, etc. 10:57, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Holy shit Auron, did you even read the content of the discussion? Misery 12:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Auron: No, but it was obvious. Titani Ertan 16:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I specifically meant the part where her msn was not working. Misery 16:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that's why I said MSN and not AIM or facebook or IRC. -Auron 16:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) One could actually plausibly argue that User:Auron was requesting User:Raine Valen to fix her MSN. Most Japanese Greetings 16:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

An interesting interpretation. Misery 16:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Interesting, yes, but I prefer people to be as precise as possible, to avoid misinterpretations and misunderstandings in general. Expressing oneself vaguely is a big cause for conflict in general. Most Japanese Greetings 16:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I could not agree more. For this reason I try to be very precise, unless of course I am being deliberately obtuse in order to confound someone. That actually occurs surprisingly often. Misery 16:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] So like

My msn died and closed all my windows. If you were talking to me, retalk to me plx. Misery 10:42, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Or I'll go to lunch, that works too. Misery 10:44, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

How did you create accounts while logged in? --Mudkips 18:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

He's Misery. Does it really require any further explanation? ··· Danny Pew Pew 19:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

If you're really curious, though, it's got to do with achieving SFG. If you don't know what SFG is, that is a shame. ··· Danny Pew Pew 19:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

While logged in, go to special pages, then click on the log in/create account page. From there click "create a new account" and bam, the account you are logged in to will be registered as creating the new account. It's useful when creating socks you want to be associated with you. I don't think I will ever have to prove ownership of Mizzles, Miz or Mis. Misery 20:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] deletion reasons

Try not to put in retarded crap for deletion reason parameters, please. -- pling 22:22, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

I do not see why it particularly matters, but ok, I can try to do that. Misery 22:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

I have to say that I agree with Misery on this one, but considering you've banned me at least twice, I have a feeling my opinion doesn't matter at all to you. :< ··· Danny Pew Pew 22:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Thunderclap

You have edited:
http://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=Thunderclap&diff=1782363&oldid=1723272
and commented it as "Specifically mentioned in skill description and lolwut"

Could you properly explain here the reason of deletion those notes? --Slavic 08:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

None cares about what's maintainable etc, and it's basic thinking to be able to maintain it. However, the skill says "create a massive lightning strike at target foes location", which would indicate that the damage is AoE, which it apparently isn't. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 09:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Those are very stupid notes. Notes aren't there to tell people about obvious(and bad) synergies, notes are there to inform people about skill mechanics which aren't obvious. 152.226.7.202 09:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

The skill description only ever mentions damage to the target. It does mention that adjacent targets are also dazed. There is no basis to assume the damage is also AoE.

Saying that something is "almost maintainable" is extremely pointless. It's not maintainable and the techniques for maintaining it are common to practically everything.

Silencing spears are good with skills that cause Daze, that is obvious, not specific to this skill. Attacking someone who is dazed is good, not specific to this skill.

@Chaos: Read the concise description, it is more accurate. Misery 09:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Your explanation is convincing, I agree. It wouldn't be a problem if the editing comments were a bit more descriptive (though any comment is better than nothing). Thanks! --Slavic 10:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

His summary was fine tbh, beats my "derp"'s. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 10:36, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

And meh still, "creating a massive lightning strike at target foes location" seems like an obvious AoE damage spell to me :< ---Chaos- (talk) -- 13:22, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't see a nearby, adjacent, in the area or earshot there. It's flavour text. Misery 14:02, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Good argument. Very well. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 14:48, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] It's like Alaska all over again!

His name is Martin. is for Raine, etc. 09:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Martin is an excellent name for a moose. Misery 09:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Marty, for short. EDIT: sign. --Curin Derwin 09:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm having fun with markers. Does anyone else need any 30-second drawings? is for Raine, etc. 09:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

A cute tiny, itty-bitty potential siggy for Curin? The color blue is preferred! =D --Curin Derwin 09:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

A blue what, though? D': is for Raine, etc. 09:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Cleverbot.

User: Hi.
Cleverbot: So... You're Cleverbot. Do something clever.
User: Actually, you're Cleverbot.
Cleverbot: Do something clever.
User: I'm not Cleverbot. You're Cleverbot; YOU should do something clever.
Cleverbot: Hi.
User: Hi! :D.
Cleverbot: Lol.
User: What's funny?
Cleverbot: Your name.
User: What's my name?
Cleverbot: Michelle.

WOW WHAT THE FUCK? is for Raine, etc. 14:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

try jabberwacky, he's more whacked. - Y0_ich_halt 16:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Cleverstalker. Misery 16:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

oh hey, that one is powered by jabberwacky. anyway:

user: the universe.

bot: Are you the universe.

user: no, i am not

bot: Then I am God. Is it ok with you?

- Y0_ich_halt 16:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

User: Hi.

Cleverbot: Are you cleverbot.

User: No.

Cleverbot: Hou are you.

User: No.

Cleverbot: No what?

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: No you.

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: Too.

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: Can you love?

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: NOU? What?

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: No you.

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: NO you.

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: Can I see your face?

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: Stop talking.

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: Nuh uh You!

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: No you.

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: NO you.

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: Oh me?

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: The game.

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: How would you describe them?

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: Nou??

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: Close. try again. Say 'NO U'.

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: You make no sense. You should watch Star Wars more often.

User: Nou.

Cleverbot: You're like a little kid you poor bot.

User: Nou.

I really like my bot. Pika Fan 16:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

User: So basically you are capable of machine learning?

Cleverbot: Yes.

User: So, what's the exact coding that makes you tick?

Cleverbot: 23.

User: I am pretty sure '23' doesn't help you learn from other people like 'real' ai does.

Cleverbot: Why do you think that?

User: Because there are no complex algorithms, nor if-then, nor fuzzy logic, nor finite state machines, nor genetic algorithms.

Cleverbot: If women only belonged in the kitchen, the world would fall apart.

User: Meh, I thought a 'clever' bot could stay on topic, guess not. Cya.

Cleverbot: That response makes no sense.

I decided to be serious this time. Pika Fan 16:49, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

User: Are you smarter than me?

Cleverbot: I don't know. How smart are you?

User: I'm pretty smart. I've got an idea on how we can figure it out. What's 2+2?

Cleverbot: 5.

User: Well, that's not right. Now ask me a math question.

Cleverbot: What is 1+2 ?

User: 3.

It then preceded to call me names and tell me to leave. It was pretty funny. Karate Jesus 17:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

GTFO KJ 1+2 = 4 ursobad (but I still <3 u). Pika Fan 17:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

420 Misery 17:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)