Feedback talk:Game updates/20140925
PvErs with henchmen in HA go go... Chieftain Alex 22:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- The update is affective 8 man battles where people leave before the match is over. The dishonor lasts what... 30 minutes? Little overkill... Gladiator Motoko (talk) 23:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- It seems like GW1 has not been completely abandoned by ANet yet. Next up would be the competitive missions playable again. Da Mystic Reaper (talk) 16:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- The N/A bots are gone, but they've been replaced by Mesmers, Spirit Spammers and Roj with vengeful weapon.. it was odd to be in a match without any N/A bots though. -Chieftain Alex 17:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- It seems like GW1 has not been completely abandoned by ANet yet. Next up would be the competitive missions playable again. Da Mystic Reaper (talk) 16:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
PRAISE ABADDON~![edit]
dear Anet, thank you. us mortals could never have expected this day would finally come.
the fair folk of Tyria are eternally grateful for what you have done.
Dishonor[edit]
for some reason everyone is getting dishonorable status after losing a match in HA
also I guess we receive 10 dishonor points for leaving a match in PvP, few guys told me they left one match in RA (they had 0 dishonor points) and gained the dishonor status Kamy (talk) 14:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi there, Your second report is related to the new Dishonor system: if you leave a match before it officially ends, you get dishonorable status immediately; to quit without getting dishonor, you need to either lose the match, win the match or /resign (after the resign delay that was just added).
- EDIT about my previous message: we did discover an issue with getting Dishonorable after a second loss and are investigating this. Thanks for your reports.
- --Stephane Lo Presti talk 17:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- Apparently you also get dishonorable when leaving a GvG scrimmage. And you can no longer resign early in a scrimmage. Are the ladder restrictions preventing guilds being matched with the same guilds for X games still in place for GvG? If this is the case, then this move reducing GvG syncers will actually make it harder for nonsync guilds to get real GvG games since they can't ladder against each other again even many hours later. Two weeks ago I suggested to Joe Kimmes to have the restrictions only apply if the battle is short (e.g. only add guild to the no-match list if the battle lasts less than X minutes) but apparently that's not doable. The idea was the syncers can have their fun while we can have our fun. Targetdrone (talk) 18:12, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
HA changes[edit]
With the new changes to HA, it would be very nice if people could take heroes instead of outdated henches to HA. It should make the place a lot more fun and lively and give the PvP heroes use again. Da Mystic Reaper (talk) 19:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)