Feedback talk:User/Enar/Shadow Form
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
IAS and IMS on an Assassin (or a Warrior for that matter, since it's in a secondary att) = BAED. Sorry, but no. --Kyoshi (Talk) 
16:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, I didn't see you changed the att. Still no. --Kyoshi (Talk)
16:31, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- And why not? The problem with (most) assassin mains in the whole gimmicky elite skill leading to massivly OP knocklock chains. Make this elite and suddenly an assassin has a Viable elite skill that goes outside of, Hmmm................. this.
- User Borotvaltgandalf tried it also turn to stance with good idea. What I think : It might be bad but its something different. If you look at other shadow form suggestion then they all just try to kill it off with same template. Nerf lasting and recharge times. Tho, you can say just no, but can you at least give some reasons why is it bad?
- And why not? The problem with (most) assassin mains in the whole gimmicky elite skill leading to massivly OP knocklock chains. Make this elite and suddenly an assassin has a Viable elite skill that goes outside of, Hmmm................. this.
No?, Because this would be too imba with SF being IMS IAS ? Enar 16:42, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) And the problem with Primal Rage in PvP is that it effectively eliminates the option of kiting for defenders. This is doing the same but without the drawback of double damage taken. You don't have to be protted or have a cancel stance; I think we'd see Assassins with Bull's Strike instead of Palm Strike + Trampling, effectively skipping a skill on their bar and still having an IMS and IAS 50% maintainable. (Also Enar's prediction.) Baed. --Kyoshi (Talk) 16:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) And the problem with Primal Rage in PvP is that it effectively eliminates the option of kiting for defenders. This is doing the same but without the drawback of double damage taken. You don't have to be protted or have a cancel stance; I think we'd see Assassins with Bull's Strike instead of Palm Strike + Trampling, effectively skipping a skill on their bar and still having an IMS and IAS 50% maintainable. (Also Enar's prediction.) Baed. --Kyoshi (Talk)
- Then tone down the IMS i suppose, Maybe 15? and btw in case you didnt know the meta for assassins ALWAYS calls for this so they could just as easily be bringing it right now. They dont because they would rather stick with the easy knockdowns
- There is a reason Way of the Assassin does not provide 33% IAS unless you invest heavily in CS. Rolling a set 33% IAS and a movement speed boost in 1 skill is rediculous. Koda
Kumi 16:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- There is a reason Way of the Assassin does not provide 33% IAS unless you invest heavily in CS. Rolling a set 33% IAS and a movement speed boost in 1 skill is rediculous. Koda
- Then tone down the IMS i suppose, Maybe 15? and btw in case you didnt know the meta for assassins ALWAYS calls for this so they could just as easily be bringing it right now. They dont because they would rather stick with the easy knockdowns
(Reset indent) oh lovely. Koda's here. Well i can no longer participate in this conversation. If i do im going to start breaching NPA. Have a nice day. 71.193.48.146 17:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well yeah Flurry is cheap and allows you take an Elite or WOTA, its Shield bash and monks, but if you look at ANet side then its Nerf and deny negative feedback from nerfed skills. SF needs nerf :D Enar 17:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
