Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Unendingfear

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Info-Logo.png Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions.

Unendingfear[edit]

This request is for the sysophood of Unendingfear (talkcontribslogsblock log).
Created by Unendingfear 19x19px 03:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC).

Status[edit]

Failed. 12:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Candidate statement[edit]

With all the new users lately, who have created lots of new pages, that need to be deleted, and the daily trolls I revert (which I would like block), I request Sysops status.

Support[edit]

  1. seems like prime candidate to me User Felix Omni Signature.pngelix Omni 03:36, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Oppose ~Shard User Shard Sig Icon.png 03:26, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  2. Oppose zzz terrible reason Jennalee 03:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  3. Oppose. Pretty much everyone dabbles in vandal fighting, and you're not particularly outstanding in that regard. Deletion of new user's pages gets done within 24 hours still so I am not worried about that at all. Finally, where have you been in policy discussions, user conflict mediation, (heavy) mainspace editing..... Vili 点 User talk:Vili 03:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  4. Oppose-- User Ariyen sig icon.gifriyen 04:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  5. Oppose. Not yet. --User Wandering Traveler Sig2.png Wandering Traveler 04:49, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  6. Oppose. Vili sums it up.--Fighterdoken 04:52, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  7. Oppose: As Vili says. Also, I would like to see any newly-minted admins make full use of edit summaries; those who infrequently explain their own contributions are less likely to help us understand their admin actions.   — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 08:16, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  8. Oppose. -- FreedomBoundUser Freedom Bound Sig.png 11:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  9. Oppose. The user has yet prove that he would be capable of using the sysop tools the the betterment of the wiki. Right now, no. NuVII User NuclearVII signature 3.jpg 11:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  10. Oppose. As per Vili. — Jon User Jon Lupen Sig Image.png Lupen 13:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  11. Oppose. No. -- User Vanguard VanguardLogo.pnganguard 14:31, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  12. User doesn't seem to understand what is required to be a good admin. – Emmett 18:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  13. Oppose. Vili explained it well. Cress Arvein User Cress Arvein sig.JPG 22:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  14. Oppose. As per the above. — Defiant Elements +talk 00:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
  15. Oppose. You're good, but if that's the reason you ask for it, then no. Being a sysop isn't just "LOLOL I'M BANNING" or/and "LOLOL I'M DELETING". Titani Uth Ertan 05:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
  16. Oppose. Just no, sorry. -- Cyan User Cyan Light sig.jpg 10:56, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 10:55, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
  17. ...

Neutral[edit]

  1. yea don't know you at all- User Zesbeer sig.png Zesbeer 03:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  2. Not particularly swayed either way, atm. King Neoterikos 04:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)