Guild Wars Wiki talk:Elections/2009-04 bureaucrat election/Shard

LOL Lilondra *panda* 10:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I really dont know what to say. --Burning Freebies 12:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm not very good remember names. But isn't Shard one of those guys 'on thin ice'? And isn't the guy that nominated him, one of htose few guys that agree with him when they go around talk pages complaining about everything in a 'slightly' impolite way? MithTalk 14:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I think he is one of the more... interesting... candidates. I think, though, that he could proboably do a good job, he just fails at NPA. --Gah Eat my uber regen. 15:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

The advantage of being warned and blocked so much is that you learn the rules quickly XD. I've been here long enough to know the policies inside and out, people just won't vote for me because of my record. ~Shard 19:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

If you give people good reasons for voting on you, then they vote on you? ^^ |Cyan LightLive!| 19:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Most of the time if you compare izzy to a retarded zoomonkey or NPA regina/linsey (dont know you proly did that aswell) people start to not like you.I mean He'd have to make skill of the day skill of the DAY AND be nice to other people to get people to vote for him.I got nothing against shard but I dont really think he'll make it :p Lilondra *panda* 19:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, he is an interesting choise (soz, dont want to be rude) |Cyan LightLive!| 19:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

He doesn't troll Linsey. We like Linsey, and she's been very nice to us. You have Kim Chase confused with Linsey...she's the one Shard said "has the IQ of a chair". Lilondra, I love you, but use quotes and evidence to back up arguments please...such as proof of Shard calling or comparing Izzy to a "retarded zoomonkey" before you say he and I think that (yes, you accused me of it once too, and I have never called anyone a name).--*Yasmin Parvaneh* 22:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Isn't it faster to read the rules to learn them than breaking them at the drop of a hat and learning from each mistake? Anyways, I'll vote you if you bribe me with honey roasted peanuts. Lots of them. I love honey roasted peanuts. MithTalk 22:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I believe I was comparing anet's thought processes to retarded monkeys in a zoo when referencing a developer update. The only person I've called an idiot is izzy, and I still stand by my opinion. All the devs are good at what they do (except Regina), and I actually talk to many of them every once in awhile. The Kim Chase thing was a misunderstanding, and I fully apologized for it right after it happened.

Also, I'm afraid I don't have any peanuts. How about a bowl of Honey Bunches of Oats? I have the kind with freeze-dried peaches in them. ~Shard 23:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

No peanuts, no vote. MithTalk 23:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

(> proly < did that aswell) I think I made clear I wasnt certain my point is that you cant neglect that shard has NPA'd quite alot of people and I dont think people will check his log to see how many people and wich ones (and more important WHY) and then decide tbh Lilondra *panda* 06:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

To quote a song, "A black past is an effective foresight." — Jon Lupen 06:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

If they ask, I will tell them. ~Shard 09:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Lets set one thing straight. adrin doesn't follow Shard, Shard follows adrin. I granted him the honor of a nomination from myself. we dont give linsey crap anymore, it's regina. with good reason. --adrin 09:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks adrin, you're such a pal. Now go get 100 edits so you can vote against me. ~Shard 09:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Giving Regina crap is only going to alienate one more Arena Net staff member from the wiki. — Jon Lupen 15:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Rofl, okay now this is an interesting election. -- Halogod35 16:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm not shure what to vote. I could support you, because you appear much more interesting than other candidates. But I don't want to disappoint you. Yullive 09:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm -so- voting for him.-- anguard 15:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

i wish i could :/--92.11.114.7 16:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

So register and contribute. They'll be another one of these in 6 months or something.-- anguard 17:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

They're every 2 months, until more BCrat seats get added (idk how adding seats works) ~Shard 20:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

When someone assassinates a bureaucrat because of their stupidity, a seat opens up. --Gah Eat my uber regen. 13:00, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

→ moved from Guild Wars Wiki:Elections/2009-04 bureaucrat election/Shard

Lol, Eloc got owned. Dont worry, youve got my opposition. --Burning Freebies 14:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Woops, i posted in wrong area. --Burning Freebies 21:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Lol, I think cursed angel could rack up more. -- Halogod35 05:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Well Shard, your half the way there. --Burning Freebies 13:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Damn it, some people have more opposing votes than me! I hate you guys!!!! ~Shard 03:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

With 2 established trolls and a whoru, you have some very tough competition. --Riddle 03:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

At least youre getting some support. It means people actually like you. --Burning Freebies 16:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

I like people who don't fuck around. Same reason I like Auron.-- anguard 16:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)