Guild Wars Wiki talk:Requests for adminship/Armond
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Status should be changed to "Ongoing but pointless." Discuss. ~Shard 
05:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Seconded. — Jon
Lupen 18:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I personally think it is important to follow due process for these things so that people can't claim that the man is keeping them down. I consider Armond very likely to do this as he definitely considers me to be the man. Misery 22:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Would that be "the man" in the sense of the very non-specific government entity called upon by hippies and weirdos that always seems to be oppressing them, or would that be "the man" in the sense of WHO DA MAN? —Jette
22:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Congratulations, you picked up on my humorous and ambiguous play on words. Wasn't it amusing? But as light-hearted as that was, my point was in earnest. That is not a play on words. Misery 06:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Would that be "the man" in the sense of the very non-specific government entity called upon by hippies and weirdos that always seems to be oppressing them, or would that be "the man" in the sense of WHO DA MAN? —Jette
- I personally think it is important to follow due process for these things so that people can't claim that the man is keeping them down. I consider Armond very likely to do this as he definitely considers me to be the man. Misery 22:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Support[edit]
Omg, you actually got a supporting vote. Although "For the lulz," is the worst reason I can think of to support an RFA. — Jon 
Lupen 13:51, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, hell, I got a supporting vote, and I made it as obvious as possible it was a troll RFA without blatantly going out and stating it, and most of the crap I've done is way worse than most of the crap Armond has done. —Jette 14:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
