Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Armond
Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions. |
Armond[edit]
This request is for the sysophood of Armond (talk • contribs • logs • block log).
Created by -- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 02:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC).
Status[edit]
Failed. 22:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Candidate statement[edit]
Hi, oppose me.
But before you do, yes, this is actually serious. My main intent here is to set a baseline for people's expectations. I recognize that I'm not fit for adminship on this wiki (for the same reasons Vili was opposed so much, basically), but I find that simply telling myself "ok, as of this date, you're going to stop trolling/being a douche/etc and actually try to help out on wiki" doesn't seem to work for whatever reason. As such, I'm putting myself in the community spotlight. I figure after this dies I'll try again in a few months and see how much people think I've improved, what else I need to work on, etc. It might take a few more goes, but meh, wiki-sysop skills can be useful real life skills to, so it's worth working on.
Don't support with "he did a great job on PvX". It's been a while, and PvX's environment was almost completely different from GWW's (unlike GWiki's, before someone points out that this is what I did with Vili). Also, I kind of didn't do a great job there.
Here's to a better me.
-- Armond Warblade{{Bacon}} 02:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Support[edit]
Oppose[edit]
- "<Armond> Who wants me to create good drama?" ~Shard 03:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- are you fucking joking? no. --adrin 03:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- can you guys stop putting stupid rfas forward and acting like you're gonna reform? -Auron 05:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Like you said in your statement. First stop being all that. Titani Ertan 05:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Armond, I don't see enough positive that you'd be good and helpful with the community. You can have a few good arguments, but not even with you wanting to be into 'drama'(As stated in mIrc of which shard posted.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ariyen (talk • contribs) at 05:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC).
- "<Armond> yes, this is actually serious"(ly a joke). -- Lacky 06:21, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- As per the candidate statement C4K3 Talk 06:23, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Stop dropping my name like it means something. Other than that, you shouldn't tip your hand so easily if you're truly serious about getting ops (which, since it's you, I don't doubt). Vili 点 07:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- So all of a sudden, this page is just a means of putting yourself in the community spotlight? Essays belong in userspace, bye. — Why 10:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- No comment. — Jon Lupen 13:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- lol - Mini Me 14:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- tbh, I would have supported you, but I supported Vili as well....so what does that say of me? Karate Jesus 14:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Uhh... - J.P.Talk 14:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Change first before you go for an RfA.. Nobody will believe you that you want to change (what probably won't happen anyway) after a successful RfA.. poke | talk 14:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Change that there's no possibility I will believe in. -- FreedomBound 15:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Not neutral enough — Seru Talk 15:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- ^Poke. – Emmett 00:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- cool story, bro. --Cursed Angel 07:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Halogod35
- Oppose — Defiant Elements +talk 15:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Move to userspace please ~ Kurd 21:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sorry man, not this time. -- Wandering Traveler 21:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Can i haz rfa tew?-- anguard 18:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose lolwut? Cress Arvein 00:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- What poke said. King Neoterikos 00:54, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Neutral[edit]
- Too arrogant for sentry of teh wikilands. I wont oppose cuz he hasn't done anything wrong to me yet. :> Nectarines // 15:02 28 September 2009(UTC)
- I seem to have started an amusing trend, let's see how far this goes. Personally, I think everybody should be sysop after they get autoconfirmed. That's just me though. —Jette 15:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- I accept Armond's challenge to set a baseline for new behavior from the date of this RFA forward. I hope that Armond continues to have strong opinions and yet change the way in which they are expressed (e.g. showing consideration that others might not share those well-founded opinions). I think a helpful Armond would be a powerful force for this wiki. — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 08:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- --Dominator Matrix 05:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)