Guild Wars Wiki talk:Requests for technical administration/Enable more subpages
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Request passed along[edit]
Hello everyone! I just wanted to mention that I passed this request along to IT today. I will keep you posted about the status. -- Emily Diehl (talk) 21:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Request installed[edit]
I've received word that subpages have been enabled for the main Guild Wars Wiki namespace. The IT team mentioned that subpages should have already been active on the Guild and Guild talk namespaces, so if you guys have any issues creating them, please let me know immediately so I can pass the problem along for review. -- Emily Diehl (talk) 01:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Emily :) LordBiro 07:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem to have had any effect as far as I can tell; the Guild Wars Wiki namespace acts like subpages are disabled. (Guild and Guild talk are working though) --Rezyk 21:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hey guys...I passed this along to IT, and they don't see any issues with the subpages. The example they gave of this functionining properly is this page: Sir_Pohl_Sanbert/Collector. As you can see, subpages seem to behaving properly in this instance. Do you have any examples of the pages not functioning so I can pass that to them to check out? -- Emily Diehl (talk) 21:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- I see. Sir Pohl Sanbert/Collector is part of the main namespace, but the request for subpages is for the Guild Wars Wiki namespace instead. (It might be referred to as NS_PROJECT in the code.) Some example non-working pages:
- Sorry; I really should have given an example page within the original request. --Rezyk 22:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- Good to know, Rezyk. I'll pass this along to IT to make sure that that namespace was included as well. -- Emily Diehl (talk) 17:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, it looks like it was fixed/completed recently. Thanks, nameless IT guys and Emily! =) --Rezyk 18:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Subpages are still enabled in the main namespace, was this intended? - anja 00:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)