Talk:Game updates/20090212
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
THANKGOD THEY DIDNT NURF ANYTHING!
- btw it's balthazor who is god i dont get it who what jesus? Vael Victus 02:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
hi[edit]
Vael Victus 02:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- ekwals best bueld ever--75.94.77.148 02:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Bueld FTW. --138.89.241.10 17:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Lolwut?[edit]
How the hell does a bug like this slip through?--118.90.5.215 02:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nvm then, looks like I just fell for vandalism.--118.90.5.215 02:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're a bug. --138.89.210.140 04:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- No U.--118.90.5.215 05:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Your existence is a bug. --138.89.244.233 20:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- No U.--118.90.5.215 05:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're a bug. --138.89.210.140 04:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hidden Valentine update?[edit]
Or really a bug :) DarkY 07:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- target foe suffers disease for 3...6...12 months 92.238.76.95 08:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Target Touched Foe. Backsword 08:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Spell. Exploit nearest female to create a level 1...5...6 month old crying baby. When the crying baby grows up, it is replaced by a level 12...16...17 year old teenager that causes annoyance with each of its requests. 92.238.76.95 08:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- I find that spell offensive, for I am 15 years old. :P Arty 12:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- hahahaha you peeps crack me up... --|pixy| 13:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Your face cracks me up. --138.89.210.140 15:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well it's not a defensive spell, so yeah I guess so. Woop ‧ talk ‧ 16:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- hahahaha you peeps crack me up... --|pixy| 13:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- The Anon with the spell forgot the clause "This has 100% armor penetration." --Riddle 17:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't be able to use that skill, since I've already used Final Thrust. :( 86.141.200.202 22:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Just be sure to spend some points in your Protection Prayers, kids. --Arduinna 22:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Always bring a Life Sheath to the Party. (Rylkan)
- "On Your Knees!" "Victory is Mine!" Final Thrust i do it in this order but there's always Way of the Empty Palm92.238.76.95 17:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- You forgot the next ones after final thrust... Gash, Enfeeble, Wither and Revive Animal. Anyway, whatever that bug was, it didn't get fixed, you're all still crazy!! (Terra Xin 18:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC))
- You crazy. --138.89.241.10 17:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- You forgot the next ones after final thrust... Gash, Enfeeble, Wither and Revive Animal. Anyway, whatever that bug was, it didn't get fixed, you're all still crazy!! (Terra Xin 18:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC))
- "On Your Knees!" "Victory is Mine!" Final Thrust i do it in this order but there's always Way of the Empty Palm92.238.76.95 17:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Always bring a Life Sheath to the Party. (Rylkan)
- Just be sure to spend some points in your Protection Prayers, kids. --Arduinna 22:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't be able to use that skill, since I've already used Final Thrust. :( 86.141.200.202 22:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- I find that spell offensive, for I am 15 years old. :P Arty 12:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Spell. Exploit nearest female to create a level 1...5...6 month old crying baby. When the crying baby grows up, it is replaced by a level 12...16...17 year old teenager that causes annoyance with each of its requests. 92.238.76.95 08:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Target Touched Foe. Backsword 08:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Keeping the site professional[edit]
RE: Talk:Game_updates/20090212#Hidden_Valentine_update.3F
Can we honestly make a policy for immature stuff like this? i come to this site for information and insight, not childish behavier and offensive comments. these comments give the impression that this is how the guildwars community is going to act and that the site incourages it. 72.183.202.229 19:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's a talk page. It's about a nonsense topic. Don't worry about it. When serious stuff needs to be discussed it gets discussed seriously. And, again, it's on a talk page. If that were on an actual article, yeah that'd be bad, but it's not. --JonTheMon 19:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Can we make a policy to prevent you from having an opinion? --138.89.244.233 20:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Only if we make a policy to prevent anons from contributing. Ups. Vili 21:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- In any case, once upon a time existed the consensus that off-topic conversations like the one above could be moved to more proper locations (like a userspace) if someone deemed it necesary. Either way, useful content is placed in the main article, and talk pages are for discussing the articles or their content, and not really the topic related to the content, so a talk page is not really the place for looking for information or insight.--Fighterdoken 21:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Learn how to talk. --138.89.241.10 17:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- In any case, once upon a time existed the consensus that off-topic conversations like the one above could be moved to more proper locations (like a userspace) if someone deemed it necesary. Either way, useful content is placed in the main article, and talk pages are for discussing the articles or their content, and not really the topic related to the content, so a talk page is not really the place for looking for information or insight.--Fighterdoken 21:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Only if we make a policy to prevent anons from contributing. Ups. Vili 21:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Can we make a policy to prevent you from having an opinion? --138.89.244.233 20:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)