Talk:Game updates:January 2010
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
Note: To discuss individual updates, please use the relevant update's feedback talk page. If you wish ArenaNet to use your comments, you have to use the feedback talk pages: |
Shouldn't update pages be protected by default or something? Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә 
ѕνәи Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 01:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, at least to IP editors. ThrainFile:User Thrain Sig.pngcontribs 01:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe if the updates were worthwhile people would have more respect. 70.188.168.127 01:31, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe if people had any common decency they wouldn't vandalize a public site. ThrainFile:User Thrain Sig.pngcontribs 01:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- At least they are quickly removed. Most times you can miss them with all the rapid editing. Previously Unsigned 01:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well with the amount of people coming here the instant the updates come out, it would be helpful to protect. Especially since it's never put on the official website in time. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә
ѕνәи Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 01:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- There are a couple of problems with protecting these pages. First, we really have no idea when an update is coming until it does. Second, due to a problem with the Anet wiki server, when a page gets protected, the entire wiki goes down for 3-5 minutes. All of this vandalism is undone within seconds of it being posted, and the worst offenders get blocked. It's not something we can't handle. -- Wyn
talk 01:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- something that can be handled....but still happens every time?AurenX 21:44, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- There are a couple of problems with protecting these pages. First, we really have no idea when an update is coming until it does. Second, due to a problem with the Anet wiki server, when a page gets protected, the entire wiki goes down for 3-5 minutes. All of this vandalism is undone within seconds of it being posted, and the worst offenders get blocked. It's not something we can't handle. -- Wyn
- Well with the amount of people coming here the instant the updates come out, it would be helpful to protect. Especially since it's never put on the official website in time. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә
- At least they are quickly removed. Most times you can miss them with all the rapid editing. Previously Unsigned 01:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe if people had any common decency they wouldn't vandalize a public site. ThrainFile:User Thrain Sig.pngcontribs 01:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe if the updates were worthwhile people would have more respect. 70.188.168.127 01:31, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- ← moved to Feedback talk:Game updates/20100128
Dec 28th update[edit]
- ← moved to Feedback talk:Game updates/20100128
Last used character selected again[edit]
At some point the last used character is being selected on log in again instead of the security question character just thought i'd put this up here cause i dont see it mentioned elsewhere but i didnt look very carefully... --Skekzyz 22:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure that was there fix to failing at reconnecting if you answered the security question with a name of a character other than the one that was currently in the instance. --Orry 23:16, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
