Talk:Greater Stoneblade
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Picture[edit]
- ← moved to Talk:Greater Arced Blade
Seriously[edit]
- ← moved to Talk:Greater Arced Blade
PHALLIC[edit]
Confirmed. Firoas. 01:34, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- I just had a good laugh when i saw this article. This page is quite exploitable for accordant jokes thanks due to the fact how wikicode works. In fact, i was directed to this page exactly the way i just mentioned. The desinger of this weapon must have been in rutting season while creating this. Yay for Greater Stoneblade! Even the name itself could be an allusion. The only thing missing now is a well-suiting offhand for an interesting weapon set... —ZerphaThe Improver 00:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- For an offhand, take your pick. Karate Jesus 00:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Are you sure those are big enough? :o Vili 点 08:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Not big enough for Dreadspawn Maw. Abaddon's vag is too big for anything (or anyone). Paddymew 17:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Maw the Mountain Heart could take it head on. --Arduin 17:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- You just invoked Rule 34! We are all doomed! Paddymew 05:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Possibly this weapon actually exists because some 4chan loving weapon designer felt like having more rule 34 material for guild wars? Although you don't quite have to invoke anything concerning rule 34 anyways i guess, it's inherently present everywhere. —ZerphaThe Improver 17:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thinking of something in the manner that Arduin did invokes rule 34. Posting it on the wiki only makes it known to the rest of the world ;) Paddymew 19:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Looking at the entire talk page and the new image uploaded by Karate Jesus again, Vehemt actually appears to be the one who invoked rule34, for he had uploaded a red died Arced Blade instead of the actual one. —ZerphaThe Improver 18:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well, there is also a Greater Arced Blade which has a very phallic color and shape, but the image may or may not be valid. We really need a new image of the Greater Arced to find out whether or not it is quite as rule34ish as it appears. Karate Jesus 19:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Greater Arced Blade looks like this. Greater Stone Blade is another skin altogether. Some guy just made a mistake and swapped the two names before making the wiki pages for the weapons. Paddymew 04:43, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- What? I'm the one who fixed the pages. The images and weapons are all correct now...so I don't really know what you're saying. Karate Jesus 14:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm saying that what people are discussing in this talk page regards the Greater Arced Blade. The stoneblade isn't phallic at all... Paddymew 13:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please check the timestamps. – Emmett 22:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Checked. Ranging from january to now. Your point being? Paddymew 13:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Back then, the image on this page was the G. Arced Blade's image, so everyone thought it was phallic. This wasn't corrected until September 09. So, what the people were really discussing was the GAB, not the Stoneblade- it just happens to be on this page. – Emmett 13:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Which differs in no what from what I meant with what I said. I'm saying that what people are discussing in this talk page regards the Greater Arced Blade. Paddymew 06:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- ...yes, that's true... was there a reason for pointing that out here, when people were already aware? I guess you can move this discussion to the other page if it bothers you?... – Emmett 12:22, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- I just responded to "Well, there is also a Greater Arced Blade which has a very phallic color and shape, but the image may or may not be valid." Paddymew 05:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- ...yes, that's true... was there a reason for pointing that out here, when people were already aware? I guess you can move this discussion to the other page if it bothers you?... – Emmett 12:22, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Which differs in no what from what I meant with what I said. I'm saying that what people are discussing in this talk page regards the Greater Arced Blade. Paddymew 06:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Back then, the image on this page was the G. Arced Blade's image, so everyone thought it was phallic. This wasn't corrected until September 09. So, what the people were really discussing was the GAB, not the Stoneblade- it just happens to be on this page. – Emmett 13:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Checked. Ranging from january to now. Your point being? Paddymew 13:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please check the timestamps. – Emmett 22:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm saying that what people are discussing in this talk page regards the Greater Arced Blade. The stoneblade isn't phallic at all... Paddymew 13:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- What? I'm the one who fixed the pages. The images and weapons are all correct now...so I don't really know what you're saying. Karate Jesus 14:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Greater Arced Blade looks like this. Greater Stone Blade is another skin altogether. Some guy just made a mistake and swapped the two names before making the wiki pages for the weapons. Paddymew 04:43, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well, there is also a Greater Arced Blade which has a very phallic color and shape, but the image may or may not be valid. We really need a new image of the Greater Arced to find out whether or not it is quite as rule34ish as it appears. Karate Jesus 19:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Looking at the entire talk page and the new image uploaded by Karate Jesus again, Vehemt actually appears to be the one who invoked rule34, for he had uploaded a red died Arced Blade instead of the actual one. —ZerphaThe Improver 18:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thinking of something in the manner that Arduin did invokes rule 34. Posting it on the wiki only makes it known to the rest of the world ;) Paddymew 19:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Possibly this weapon actually exists because some 4chan loving weapon designer felt like having more rule 34 material for guild wars? Although you don't quite have to invoke anything concerning rule 34 anyways i guess, it's inherently present everywhere. —ZerphaThe Improver 17:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- You just invoked Rule 34! We are all doomed! Paddymew 05:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Maw the Mountain Heart could take it head on. --Arduin 17:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Not big enough for Dreadspawn Maw. Abaddon's vag is too big for anything (or anyone). Paddymew 17:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Are you sure those are big enough? :o Vili 点 08:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- For an offhand, take your pick. Karate Jesus 00:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)