Talk:Sao

Move discussion

I'm not even 100% sure which "SoA" is being reffered to as the skill, and I've never heard that abbreviation been used, so I don't think there's much of a need for a move/disambig. That's just my personal experience, unless SoA is a well-known abbreviation in PvP or somewhere else I don't really pay attention to. ~FarloTalk 21:25, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Shield of Absorption is amazing in both pve and pvp but I'm fairly sure he mentioned SaO, not SoA.

Either way, I'm against a move. If there's a skill with that abbreviation, there can be a disambig link *from* this page, but this page shouldn't be moved simply so there can be two disambig links from a useless stub. -Auron 21:44, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Yup, my bad, long day :P ~FarloTalk 21:54, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Maybe if anyone actually used Strike as One, but they don't. 76.78.119.108 22:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Against, barely anyone knows strike as one. npc should keep his name and there shouldn't be a diambig. --File:User Chieftain Alex Chieftain Signature.pngChieftain Alex 22:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Against. SoA can be made into a redirect and Template:Otheruses can be used if its at all desired. I never heard of SoA though. Konig/talk 07:26, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

SoA = Shield of Absorption / SaO = Strike as One. it's pretty common (and some people DO use SaO --The Holy Dragons 08:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

I... Don't know why I typo'd that... I mean SaO the entire time. Konig/talk 08:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm against a move. SaO isn't used a lot and isn't as common as SoA or SF (e.g.). So please don't take Sao's name away from him. Het might even sent a crab at us to SaO.Rumian 09:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Wow, Farlo. You gave like... what? Two days? People might be *away* during weekend. Way to fail. 88.152.25.23 15:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Also, you as a self-proclaimed cartographer pro should know what a SaO chain is. 88.152.25.23 15:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

you yourself just refered to it as a SaO chain not Sao. fail logic. also there is a general agreement that it is unnecessary.--File:User Chieftain Alex Chieftain Signature.pngChieftain Alex 15:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

The failure is yours, Chieftain Alex, in not knowing that GWW cannot distinguish between SaO and Sao as article names. 88.152.25.23 15:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

The failure is yours for caring. -- Armond Warblade 15:37, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Indeed, a fitting remark, Almomd. 88.152.25.23 15:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Actually, ip, it is sao and Sao that can't be distinguished. Sao and SaO are very much different. Konig/talk 19:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Haha, I love the "fail" being thrown around. I decided to take off the tag because as of then it was 6-1 against, and I didn't think the ratio would change too much, if at all, but go ahead and put the tag up if you think so.

Also, where am I proclaiming to be a cartographer pro? I'm not the one that made CME, I just used it and have used Pyron Sy's textures. I've actually never used a SaO chain, although I actually just looked up what it was. (Just so I fit in with the cool kids: "f-f-fail.") ~FarloTalk 20:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Far as formatting, this could have a disambig at the top to link to another page that tells about the SaO build. Otherwise, this guy deserves the page over the SaO builds. 72.148.31.114 01:58, 22 August 2011 (UTC)