Template talk:Redundant image

so...whats the basic template wording for this?

  { {Redundant image|<imagename>} }?

--Raph Talky 19:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. --Rezyk 19:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

k, looks nice--Raph Talky 19:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't like the idea of having multiple unneeded deletion templates with predefined reasons. It makes tagging more complicated. poke | talk 19:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I have to agree with poke here - just putting "see suchandsuchurl" as the delete reason works fine. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 19:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Calor 19:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I also don't see a real need for this template. --Kakarot 22:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't feel that necessity is really a reasonable requirement. I'll assume that there is some other disliked aspect (which I don't see/get..who does it make things more complicated for?) that perhaps outweighs any benefits. Anyways, I don't see the benefits as especially important so it's no big deal to go ahead with the deletion. --Rezyk 15:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)