User talk:ClanYumemiru

m0o. Armond 15:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

m0o to you too! Clan Yumemiru 16:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

MooCult Mephisto 14:43, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

It seems that you tried to move a topic on a bug report page to the localization bugs page, although you actually moved the full talk page itself. I reverted that, not all things on that page are related to polish localization bugs :P If you want to move a single topic, copy and paste and use the {{moved}} template. - anja 22:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Oops! Thank you very much! That was a very newbie and very embarrassing mistake! *bright red faced now* Clan Yumemiru 08:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Useful wiki links (Because I sometimes forget stuff, too)

Userboxes found here: http://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=Category:User_box_templates&until=PA Clan Yumemiru 11:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

huh

User_talk:Mini_Me#troll huh huh huh? Mini Me 18:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Please keep patrolling the bridge assigned to you in the indicated zone ... Clan Yumemiru 19:56, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Very witty. Mini Me 20:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Please put responses to my observations regarding the state of the game here, kthnx

(Edit: reniced header) So you disagree with what I think of the state of the game (which is pretty fucked right now) - go ahead, vent your spleen, I don't mind. Bonus points for creativity, originality, verbal eloquence and lack of raging. Clan Yumemiru 19:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

There were very specific and important reasons for what was done, everything is just too far above your head for you to understand. Don't feel bad though.  :) Anet 18:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The specific and important reason of course being survival of the company until they have their WoW clone ready to fight the 800-pound gorilla - a fight they will lose regardless of what business/play model they choose; as much as I'd love to see them win, the reality is that the chance of that is minimal.

I fully understand what's going on; instead of catering to the "casual" players their original business model they designed their game around (whereby players drift in and out the game) ArenaNet have chosen to shamelessly pander their game to the loudmouth powergamers who will never have enough status no matter what they are given. They (a.net) have badly overreached on their capability to develop their succession title, failed to meet their time schedule and are now in CYA mode to cover for the big gap they've left. A damn shame for what was a good game. Oh well. It's been >3 fun years for me - just regrettably that it had to end like this. Clan Yumemiru 07:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

so...do I get bonus points? Anet 21:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

B for effort/originality, C for verbal eloquence, but an A+ for triggered response :D Clan Yumemiru 07:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree with this completely, and almost all of your page, except I haven't done everything yet (I was in on the beta, I just don't get as much time as most other people) so I still have stuff to try and am still having fun (via solo PvE). Now I'm not having near as much fun as when I first went through Prophecies the first time, but I'm having a lot more fun than when I went through Factions the first time. It is also still a great solo PvE game for anybody that hasn't played it. It is sad watching the game crumble around me as I wander around doing stuff. 68.231.146.44 02:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Glad to see I'm not the only one that feels there's too much wasted potential in this game ... Clan Yumemiru 17:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

You still seem to be pretty much in love with the game, but disapointed by GW2 release delay. You may want to know that there is a discussion about how GW players can make their suggestions to be considered by ArenaNet here - > Guild_Wars_Wiki_talk:Suggestion_pages_restructuring and here -> User_talk:Mike_O'Brien. I do hope, however, that you reconsider your language and will be constructive in your offerings if you would like to be heard. Thanks. HH LEADER talk 18:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

I couldn't care less about GW2 to be honest. What I read about it and the things they intend to do make my stomach churn. They are trying too hard to become "similar to" and I like GW because it's "different from". I don't care about the delay - actually, the further it slips into vaporware territory the better - preferably to the point of abandonment. As for language - don't worry, I can be very articulate, but the misplaced hype surrounding this "update" got so much on my nerves I blew a fuse - and paid the price for it. Clan Yumemiru 20:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

I understand you completely. I also had an impression that return of a Dragon with global notification and the persistent universe may not be a GW cup of tea. There are some positive sides like, for instance, there will be no separate PvP vs. PvE characters that annoys me in current GW. And persistent universe can be turned to some advantage depending on how it is implemented and for what purpose. And because I am naive, I am trying to influence ArenaNet decisions on what they are about to do, and so many other players did by submitting their suggestions. Now they seem to be willing to listen, but it remains to be seen if they go far enough on this route to save the day and the game. If GW2 is to GW as Oblivion to Morrowind, I probably won't be playing it. Many people who were awaiting Oblivion after buying it were saying that they will never buy another game from this company ever.

I had a talk with Regina and warned her that in event when players expectations are high and are not managed (like now) the product can face the failure on the market when it is finally released. There seem to be a reaction on this message for now Mike O'Brien talks to this Wiki users on his talk page about GW2 suggestions fate. The sequel is not always better than original and in many cases it becomes a disapointment, a vaporware, as you say... In this unfortunate event, I would highly recommend the comppany to go back to GW and release paid update based on customers' feedback if they still have enough of us by this time. HH LEADER talk 21:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

NPA

Why don't you take the next 24 hrs to think about calling users on this wiki lazy or stupid. Just because it is directed at a whoever is reading your post rather than a specific person does not make it acceptable. -- Wyn 19:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Point taken - I flubbed. My emotions got the better of me and I crossed the line. Punishment accepted & served. Clan Yumemiru 17:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Userpage is Highly Offensive

Just putting it out there...reading it makes me want to go cry in a corner :.( Anet 18:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah well, strip facts of the social niceties people use to cradle them in and they become harsh and brutal. Wishing that it were another way doesn't change it - closing your eyes to it doesn't change it either - but speaking up about it and telling it like it is at least helps deal with it. And if enough people complain, maybe things will change (hey, that's it works for [GWGulag] too). As far as "offensive" goes, I've already paid that particular price for being careless with my vocabulary elsewhere :D Clan Yumemiru 07:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)