User talk:Galil/January 2008

Images

Hey, what's the reason for reuploading all those images? Just curious -- Brains12 • Talk • 18:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Consistent size/ratio, some images had visible borders, these look crispier, no cropping to get rid of the border, the old images were scaled up on their respective pages. Sure it might not be an overly visible improvement all the time, but a minor improvement is still an improvement. ;) — Galil 18:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Ah ok :) -- Brains12 • Talk • 18:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

God, I never realized Tyria had so many outposts... Gonna do pre-searing now, then I'll take a break before doing Cantha and Elona. — Galil 19:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Good luck ^^ -- Brains12 • Talk • 20:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Heh, I did more or less the same thing back on GuildWiki to standardise the icons :D troublesome to say the least. Btw, great looking user page, better than the old one on GuildWiki (if you're one and the same ;) -- ab.er.rant 06:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. ^^ Indeed I am. And yes, those icons are quite a pain. Especially those you can't get a hold of. I couldn't do some of the kurzick ones as I had no chars that had those outposts on their maps. I do now though, so I'll get those last two or three tomorrow. Quite thankful now for insisting that my ranger at least should get all the prophecies outposts on her map. :P — Galil 06:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, that userpage looks fantastic. Simplicity ftw :P -- Brains12 • Talk • 16:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Glad you like it. :) — Galil 20:08, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I'm quite the minimalist, so I can't disagree there about simplicity. :P — Galil 20:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for undoing that unwanted change on my userbox page :) Barinthus 07:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Most welcome. :) — Galil 07:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Zho's Journal

Nice job uploading the images for Zho's Journal. I had a quick question. Would you oppose to 'thumbing' them to be consistent with the Hero's Handbook and Master Dungeon Guide? Rappy 01:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Not at all. I looked at those pages before I changed the article, to get consistency. But it looked very odd on Zho's Journal, but I guess you've got a point. Consistency is good. — Galil 01:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

After all that work, I didn't want to go behind you and do it and try to take credit =p Rappy 01:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Heh, I'm not that self-centered. ;) Anyway there we are, consistency. ^^ — Galil 01:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks great =) Rappy 01:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Guild

Ah, for a guild, maybe mine might do, but it's very small, yet the alliance is old, and very much into PvE.. If you'd like the chance to influence [Tru], mine is up for recruiting you. --People of Antioch talk 02:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Min är säkert också öppen, Daniel och gänget spelar TA då och då (guilden är lite noobs på pvp och ville ha hjälp av oss, så dom håller på och övar), annars inte så mycket pvp än så länge. Jag har hittills bara spelat pve med dom, och vi klarade Glint i HM lätt som en kaffeskvätt. Dom verkar vara bra på pve men öppna för pvp. :) Och inget aktivitetskrav, jag är inte så aktiv själv, men det är roligt att dom är där när man loggar in till slut. - helena 08:12, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Du kan alltid prova Guilden som jag är med i (kolla forumet www.swac.forum24.se) och om det är något som är intresant så är det bara att skriva i "jag vill bli medlem". (Är själv bara en medlem så jag kan själv inte invita dig.) Tycko 11:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

(Responding in English) Woot! Suggestions! I feel the need to point out however, the most ideal guild for me would be a guild with only 12 members where everybody was active. That way you could always do anything. But then, seeing as I tend to go inactive from time to time that wouldn't work out for me, so I'd better join a guild where inactivity wouldn't be a problem (such as Helena's). The question would then be, how many members are there? Obviously if inactivity isn't a problem in a guild, it must have more members to offset the inactivity of others. Instruments Of Truth sounds like a good guild, but not one for me tbh. I hate relying on alliances and want to be in a guild that's strong on its own. Thanks for the note though! :)

(Rest of response in Swedish) Swac låter riktigt intressant. Har alltid tyckt att guilds med åldersgräns lyckas hålla en vänligare ton och mer social gemenskap. Hittar dock ingenting på forumet om antalet medlemmar, eller vad ni gör för något (HM, HA, GvG, TA, etc), eller hur ni ser på inaktivitet. Skulle jag t.ex. kunna bara "försvinna" en månad någon gång ibland?

Och som sagt, din låter också rätt intressant Helena, men samma sak gäller där. Hur är det med aktiviteten? Finns det någon inne när man loggar in? Är de så bra på PvE som du säger är det bara en fråga om tid innan de behärskar PvP också, om de ger sig fan på't. ;P — Galil 12:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Vi i SWAC spelar för det mesta PvE och inaktivitet är vi inte så sträng på om man bara har medelat det innan och om det blir längre än 3 veckor.Tycko 12:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, well, I tried. I'm mostly the active one. But I'm looking for more, as if there are more people on anyway, the better chance people will stay on. Anyways, take care. --People of Antioch talk 15:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Det är nästan alltid någon inne när man loggar in. Vissa har varit inaktiva i flera månader, vissa är inne varje dag. Dom verkar villiga att prova på det mesta. Ganska många medlemmar, men jag minns inte hur många och jag minns inte ens vad guilden heter eftersom jag själv är alldeles ny, men alla mina vänner verkar trivas. Säg till aå kan jag fixa en inbjudan om du vill prova, kan ju alltid gå ur efter ett tag om du känner att det inte passar dig. - helena 19:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Det har du ju alldeles rätt i. Fixa! :P — Galil 10:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Excellent User Page

I'd just like to say that I think your user page is one of the nicest I've ever seen. How did you make it? --Alreajk

You may want to look at the source code ;) -- Brains12 • Talk • 21:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)::

D'oh! Alreajk 21:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Anyway, do you mind If I mess around with it, Galil? Alreajk

First, glad you appreciate it. About messing around with it, I wouldn't mind at all. The code itself isn't too much of an achievement. Seeing as this is a wiki I had to make an image the background of pretty much everything. The code would have a lot more to do with it if I was coding an actual webpage. ;) — Galil 10:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I hope you know I meant that I wanted to mess around with a copy of it in my sandbox, not actually gonna screw around with your page :P. Alreajk 00:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Of course. The latter I wouldn't have agreed on. ;) — Galil 01:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to say your user page looks much better on IE with your latest edit, looks great now :) --Kakarot 14:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Encountered some trouble with IE when I first created it, but I realized I just didn't have my head with me. :P — Galil 14:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I haven't seen it before, but I noticed it now. After the "IE update" your page looks strange to me (Firefox 2.0.0.11, 1400x1050). [1] - helena 07:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

So it seems. Fixed now. Had forgotten a width. :S — Galil 15:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Beautiful user page design... Nice job. :) - nian 20:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Aye, it looks great! Calor 20:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, thank you. ^^ — Galil 07:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)