User talk:Lena

Hello, everyone.

This page belongs to Lena. Please dot delete, revert, or alter this page in any way, shape, or form. Thank you. -Lena talk 02:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

You have two userpages? O_o --Star Weaver 21:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Maybe. :< -Lena 10:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Bordom... -Lena talk 10:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Now you're talkin' to yourseeeelf! x_x. --Star Weaver 17:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

lol xD -Lena talk 17:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

This Talk Page....

....should redirect to the talk page of User talk:Uchiha Lena in the same fassion as the user page. — Jon Lupen 17:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Eh, not really. I have this page watched so I receive an email whenever it's changed or altered. -Lena talk 17:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure both pages need to redirect. Let's ask a sysop, as I'm having trouble tracking down where/if it's in policy anywhere. — Jon Lupen 17:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

lol for some reason I highly doubt something as dumb as being "required" to connect multiple accounts is in the policy. Why can't you ease up off my nuts and leave me be? Stalking/harrassment ftl. -Lena talk 17:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

edit: I'll ask you fairly and nicely... Stop harrassing/stalking my EVERY comment/contribution on this wiki. Even I am starting to get annoyed by it. -Lena talk 17:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

As far as I know, redirecting it would be a nice thing to do rather than a requirement. If Lena wants this can just be his sock account which is perfectly valid. Misery 17:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

X2(Edit conflict) There are plenty of snipers perched on top of RC. See User:Lupen/User talk:Lupen and User:Wyn/User talk:Wyn. Actualy yes, I am pretty sure connecting multiple accounts of the same person is policy. There is an established system, I'm just trying to keep things in line with that system. This isn't harrassment, this is business. — Jon Lupen 17:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I would say the redirect and note at the top of this talk connect them nicely. For example I will cite my sock account, User:Miserysock, she has no redirects or even a note, but I would argue it's pretty obvious. It means that comments related to this account can be put here while comments relating to the other account can go on that talk. Misery 18:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes. Thank you, Misery. -Lena talk 18:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I've asked Brains about this, we'll see how he rules on it. — Jon Lupen 18:04, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok, but I will point out that sysops don't actually have additional weighting in the determining of consensus. I don't believe there is any policy that governs this, but what Lena has done is far from unreasonable. Misery 18:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm not saying it's unreasonable. I asked a sysop as they tend to know policy a lot better than I do. If it's not required after all, then he doesn't have to redirect it, issue solved. — Jon Lupen 18:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

There are people which still hide from a certain policy <__< Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 18:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

zZzZzZzZz... Is the stalking done yet? Can we move on form this nonsense? -Lena talk 18:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

It's not stalking, have a look at Special:RecentChanges, you can see every edit that's made. There are people who watch RC to help keep vandalism to a minimal and keep things in line with policy, ect. — Jon Lupen 18:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism? ... Okay... That I can understand. BUT, that has nothing to do w/ my pages both belonging to me, and, was a HORRIBLY example for stalking my page. Clearly this is not "vandalism" so how can you even use that as a cover for coming to my every post? It's simple. To check it's vandalism, click the edit, look at it, if it isn't, click that cute little back-arrow and be done with it. Anyways, please go away already. -Lena talk 18:33, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Since my opinion was requested... What Mis said. If you want another example of an alternate account, Wikichu is a good one. -- Brains12 \ talk 18:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Alright, issue closed then, as you were, forget I was here. — Jon Lupen 19:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)