User talk:Uchiha Lena
Wow you're like me, sorta
I've been reading ur posts and it seems anet really had it out for you. Shards and my bans were for our attitude on the wiki. Yours seemed to just be that they just wanted you gone. When your GF got banned that was really fucked up. If Yasmin got banned for having a shared IP as me, they'd have more than bitching on the wiki coming their way. Also, lemming doesnt seem to like either of us. BTW, do u liek mudkips? --adrin 10:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yea, it sures seems that way, huh? Life can be so messed up when people (Arena.Net) are intentionally out to get you.
- Oh, oops. To answer your question: yes, yes I liek Mudkipz. :D -Lena talk 11:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- U should enter my contest and stuff --adrin 06:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, oops. To answer your question: yes, yes I liek Mudkipz. :D -Lena talk 11:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Stop spamming please
This is not a damn advertising wiki.. poke | talk 00:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- How else do you get the word out? ._. -Lena™ talk 00:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- You put a wee advert on your user page, you dont need to spam everyones page with "vote for me", style messages. -- Salome 00:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- At least not with advertising. Post a reasoned text wall or something on your election page if you want to get people to vote for you. poke | talk 00:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- :( ...Fine... :( -Lena™ talk 00:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- There's a site-wide notice pointing to the election page. That might get some people to notice *shrug* -- Brains12 \ talk 00:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Fine, fine. Fair enough. Ignore my edits, then. :) -Lena™ talk 00:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Can you add a site-wide message that says "Vote for Raine!" (or change the existing one)? I mean, it's not really spamming... Raine - talk 03:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- You might also want to make sure that the people you are asking to vote for you are eligible to vote:
- Wafflez = not enough qualified edits to vote
- Venemouth = not enough qualified edits to vote
- Borotvaltgandalf = not enough qualified edits to vote
- Yasmin Parvaneh = not enough qualified edits to vote
- Just a thought :P -- Wyn 03:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm.... I'm.............. going to go cry in my corner. :( --W a f f l e z 04:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- You might also want to make sure that the people you are asking to vote for you are eligible to vote:
- Can you add a site-wide message that says "Vote for Raine!" (or change the existing one)? I mean, it's not really spamming... Raine - talk 03:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Fine, fine. Fair enough. Ignore my edits, then. :) -Lena™ talk 00:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- There's a site-wide notice pointing to the election page. That might get some people to notice *shrug* -- Brains12 \ talk 00:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Aw, don't cry. :( Want me to give you another cookie? :( -Lena™ talk 04:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- You'll have to ask boro, i gave it to him --adrin 04:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- lol I'll steal it when he's not looking. :D -Lena™ talk 04:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- He can post that box on my page. It's fine. I appriciate you monitoring for spam...if that is indeed the intent, though by Wyn's verbage, it appears to me she merely wants to make it abundantly clear she is the "serious" candidate and that Adrin, Shard and lena are "jokes". Let them be silly...why would you even need to make this point since you're the most qualified?--*Yasmin Parvaneh* 15:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- WUT? though by Wyn's verbage, it appears to me she merely wants to make it abundantly clear she is the "serious" candidate and that Adrin, Shard and lena are "jokes". What in the world are you talking about? I asked Lena serious questions about his candidacy, and responded in kind. I do not believe I have posted a single thing smearing the other candidates other than offering my opinion to Lena about steps I feel he could take that would be more beneficial to him "Showing his good side" to this community rather than running for Bureaucrat. And when Auron tagged those election pages for deletion, Lena protested, and removed the tag, and that's just fine with me. If Shard, or Adrin can honestly say to me (and the rest of this community) that they were running for Bureaucrat on a serious basis, not just trying to set the record for the most oppose votes, I would be pleased to have them in the running. By their own admissions, that was their actual goal in running. And be honest Yasmin.... did you actually want to run for Bureaucrat? Do you seriously have the best interest of GWW and it's community in mind when you post a contribution? I have supported everyone's right to nominate whoever they wish, and anyone who is nominated has the right to accept and be considered in the election process. I was merely pointing out to Lena that if he is going to ask people to come vote for him, he should at least take the time to make sure they are at least eligible to vote before spamming the RC. If that makes me appear as a serious candidate, there is not much I can do about it, nor do I really wish to, since I am a serious candidate. -- Wyn 05:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- I was referring to the fact that you made it a point to come onto Lena's page and show him, name by name who could not vote for him. I did not say it directly as "smearing", you assumed that word on your own. The fact that most here considered their candidacy a joke made me reply that it was unneeded for you to come on Lena's page and point out, name by name, who could and could not vote. In my opinion, and this is just that, an opinion, the action of posting said name list is overkill when all you would have needed to say is "at least take the time to make sure they are at least eligible to vote before spamming the RC".
- As for me running, if people in the community feel I am suited to the task, I will not fail them. My wants and feelings can be set aside if people request my time to partake in any type of position and project. If my contributions are in anyway questionable, please, feel free to reprimand me as seen fit.--*Yasmin Parvaneh* 19:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- And for that I applaud you, and welcome you as a candidate. It just "felt" like part of the "Oh it's election time again, let's run amok!" that was going on. I personally didn't call any of the nominations a joke, though I knew there were several that needed to be taken with the proverbial grain of salt just by their initial responses. I know that at times I take the wiki too seriously, but at least when it comes to choosing the administrative structure, it can't just be a farce either. -- Wyn 03:35, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- WUT? though by Wyn's verbage, it appears to me she merely wants to make it abundantly clear she is the "serious" candidate and that Adrin, Shard and lena are "jokes". What in the world are you talking about? I asked Lena serious questions about his candidacy, and responded in kind. I do not believe I have posted a single thing smearing the other candidates other than offering my opinion to Lena about steps I feel he could take that would be more beneficial to him "Showing his good side" to this community rather than running for Bureaucrat. And when Auron tagged those election pages for deletion, Lena protested, and removed the tag, and that's just fine with me. If Shard, or Adrin can honestly say to me (and the rest of this community) that they were running for Bureaucrat on a serious basis, not just trying to set the record for the most oppose votes, I would be pleased to have them in the running. By their own admissions, that was their actual goal in running. And be honest Yasmin.... did you actually want to run for Bureaucrat? Do you seriously have the best interest of GWW and it's community in mind when you post a contribution? I have supported everyone's right to nominate whoever they wish, and anyone who is nominated has the right to accept and be considered in the election process. I was merely pointing out to Lena that if he is going to ask people to come vote for him, he should at least take the time to make sure they are at least eligible to vote before spamming the RC. If that makes me appear as a serious candidate, there is not much I can do about it, nor do I really wish to, since I am a serious candidate. -- Wyn 05:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- He can post that box on my page. It's fine. I appriciate you monitoring for spam...if that is indeed the intent, though by Wyn's verbage, it appears to me she merely wants to make it abundantly clear she is the "serious" candidate and that Adrin, Shard and lena are "jokes". Let them be silly...why would you even need to make this point since you're the most qualified?--*Yasmin Parvaneh* 15:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- lol I'll steal it when he's not looking. :D -Lena™ talk 04:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- You'll have to ask boro, i gave it to him --adrin 04:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- :( ...Fine... :( -Lena™ talk 00:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- How else do you get the word out? ._. -Lena™ talk 00:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Fenrir
Why still a stub? (And there's also {{section-stub}}, which might be more appropriate there, although I think everyone just uses stub because it's easier.) Freedom Bound 21:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- I stubbed it because it is an incomplete walkthrough. And yes, I do stub because it's just easier. ;) -Lena™ talk 21:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- What would make the walkthrough complete, in your opinion? I look at GWW:Quests and don't really see a whole lot of requirements. Freedom Bound 22:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- I stubbed it because it is an incomplete walkthrough. And yes, I do stub because it's just easier. ;) -Lena™ talk 21:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey dude
First off, I want to say this- we've all had good relationships end in bad break-ups before. It happens, and you might feel angry or misused. But that in no way gives you the right to harass your ex publically. Now, you may feel that you weren't harassing her; in that case, don't start!
Wafflez does have the right to remove any comments she considers unwanted from her talk page, by the way. Felix Omni 22:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
*Sings* "Dramallamadramadramadramallamadramallama....-- anguard 23:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Birthdays
When is your birthday Lena? I want to make sure I remember to wish you a happy birthday on that day. Misery 22:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- lol. it's on the birthdays page if you really wanna know it. :) -Lena™ talk 22:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Heh, I always forget to check that. Oooo and it's soon. I'll mark it in my diary. Misery 22:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh don't worry I have my ways of coming to you. *wink wink* -Lena™ talk 22:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Have to be a permanent move. Long distance never works and I am contracted here for the next three years at least. Misery 22:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- darn. and here i was looking for a nice little fling. :D lol, j/k! what are you contracted to do? construction, i assume? --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Uchiha Lena (talk).
- Scientific research. Misery 23:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- darn. and here i was looking for a nice little fling. :D lol, j/k! what are you contracted to do? construction, i assume? --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Uchiha Lena (talk).
So...
Hi again. Soo...
- removed all traces of my pathetic cheating ex gf off my page
- and away from a particular bitch whom I dare not name due to it violating our NPA policy?
Do you want to be banned? Seriously, I'm more than happy to ban you for a coupla days so that you can calm down. *Defiant Elements* +talk 23:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- swearing is allowed. personally attacking someone is NOT, however. i never attacked anyone. feel free to throw a ban hammer at me if you think i did. that's like saying "OMFGGGGGGGGGGGG you said you hate oprah!!!!!!! /BAN!!!!!!!!!!!". i am entitled to curse on here. if i am not, then, i would kindly ask for you to go onto EVERY talk page that has swearing and ban the people who has ever sworn. sound like a deal? -Lena™ talk 23:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- I can say with some unbias that you did, infact, attack/harass Wafflez. Just sayin'.-- anguard 23:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm... How so? I never named her out nor gave any hint I was reffering to her (for all we know I could have been reffering to someone who wasn't even on this wiki) in the edit reason section. j/w, of course. -Lena™ talk 23:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- You tried avoiding NPA/Ban by logging off and using an IP and insulting them in third person. At the end of the day, it was still you who attacked/harassed.-- anguard 23:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm... How so? I never named her out nor gave any hint I was reffering to her (for all we know I could have been reffering to someone who wasn't even on this wiki) in the edit reason section. j/w, of course. -Lena™ talk 23:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Cursing, in of itself, is not a ban-able offense. Frankly, I don't give a damn about cursing. That said, harassment is, as is calling a particular user "pathetic" and a "bitch." The fact that you don't actually name the user is irrelevant. *Defiant Elements* +talk 23:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Ugly Member Information
- Neith is a current member of ugly ducklings. I believe she is from Spain. What would you like to know? -RoflMonkRofl 20:21, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- You are unlikely to get a response here, Lena has been perma banned. Misery 20:25, 28 June 2009 (UTC)