User talk:LordBiro/Skill box draft 3

Also looking good, are you planning on adding the same faded prof icons to this one as well? That would look nice. -FireFox File:Firefoxav.png 18:13, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Hey FireFox! Yes, I am planning on using the faded profession icons, but I can't ask for community opinion on the subject until user stylesheets are enabled. LordBiro 18:16, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Hello, me again! Just wondering why you have 2 s, when I know you've uploaded ? Oh, and , but that's not relevant to the example. :) --Snograt whisper 18:22, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Hehe, it was just a quick copy and paste job! I needed to see what it would look like if there were four icons, and rather than using another icon I just copied the last line ;) I will change it for you, Snograt! :P LordBiro 18:28, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Heh, sorry if I'm becoming a pain with my input, I'm just so damn excited about this new wiki! --Snograt whisper 18:33, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Don't apologise :) your enthusiasm is refreshing! LordBiro 18:34, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Hmmm ... just noticed that we don't have an image on this site for . The one over at Gwiki is by "Cloak of Letters", who hasn't contributed anything in months, and hasn't released his work under GFDL. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:38, 26 February 2007 (EST)

oops, we're also missing , , and . Sigh ... so much to catch up on at this wiki. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:41, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Copy-a-bility of information

I may be the only one to do this, but I like to copy the info of skills (recharge, unkeep, energy, etc...) straight from skill boxes straight into Guild Wars chat, unlike the skill box of GuildWiki this option has added unwanted formatting, while it looks flashy it lacks copy-a-bility. ps. I added alt values for the images otherwise it makes copying info a world of pain. --Jamie 13:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Hey Jamie, thanks for the alt tags, but I will not be implementing this version since skill box 5 is an improvement upon this.

As far as copy-ability goes, this isn't a huge concern for me (sorry). I think it's much more important that the markup is semantic, and therefore accessible to everyone, than it is to be able to copy the article into IRC.

Like I say, I'm sorry that we can't have the best of both worlds! LordBiro 14:53, 15 March 2007 (EDT)