User talk:Shadowphoenix/GWW Opinions/Users

Should This Sub-project Page Be Launched?

Have to say I don't like this. Seems to be pointed right down into GWW:NPA. Backsword 07:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Well I added this one mostly for joking purposes between wiki friends (or frienimes lol). But that is the point of the disclaimer at the top, any and all pages that violate policy will be marked for speedy deletion. --Shadowphoenix 07:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

I dunno, the brutal truth could be useful in some situations. this could be like the sandbox of NPA violations. I like it. If its ok, I'm adding my name in (once I get on high speed again >.<) Wandering Traveler 03:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I can see this as a bad tool for anons. I wouldn't do it. This it kinda like a can of worms. Still, we won't find out unless it's tried... --People of Antioch talk 03:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

yeah, that was my first thought...Anons and IP's could get worrisome. Perhaps....maybe theres a way to only let registered users comment on it? Wandering Traveler 03:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

That's been done on wikipedia on high profile pages, like President George Bush. here. --People of Antioch talk 04:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

and this wouldnt be considered high-priority, I take it? Wandering Traveler 04:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protection is what you're looking for. Protection from unregistered users. --People of Antioch talk 04:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

That would be a good idea, if we coud get the admins to do it :P --Shadowphoenix 04:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

fair enough for me. my vote is yes. Wandering Traveler 04:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) There should be an opt-out list too, Shadowphoenix. This reminds me of juicy campus. This can blow up bad if not done right. --People of Antioch talk 04:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I am actually realsing the project for easter, so I am going to launch it very soon. I will keep this page dormant until we decide whether or not it should be here. --Shadowphoenix 05:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

This page is pretty much asking for violation of GWW:NPA — ク Eloc 貢 20:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity what reason was there to repeat what had already been stated by not one but two users here Eloc? The first comment by Backsword being the primary one I refer to. --Kakarot 00:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Didn't read what was up above, hence I didn't indent. This was on GWW:RFC and that's my comment. — ク Eloc 貢 09:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Purpose

Since this page might be watched, I posted my thoughts: User talk:Shadowphoenix/GWW Opinions#Purpose -- ab.er.rant 08:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)