Feedback talk:User/Ardangoeswiki/Mind Wrack Mesmers PVP

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

But then I won't get to roll my face on the keyboard anymore. That means I'd actually have to start using my brain! C'mon... you know you like my 1-2-3-1-2-3's! Admit it! OLLOOLOLLLOO --72.189.77.167 08:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

So roll a bloody fire ele. Having Other Liquid Flame in the same attribute as Shame and Diversion is just ridiculous. :\ — Raine Valen User Raine R.gif 3:11, 29 Oct 2010 (UTC)
I don't mind meta-gaming. It gives the people that aren't in HA's little "inner-circle" of punks a chance to achieve rank or get into groups that aren't asking for rank or friends. I totally respect it. However.....there's bits and pieces of some metagame that I totally disrespect, and find degrading to the game. For example: MIND WRACK Ardangoeswiki 19:19, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
And lawl@72.189.77.167. Good point. Would hate to see a gamer use his brain, although the heart of this game was built around tactics/strategy/GvG. Haha. My bad. Ardangoeswiki 00:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Better use a good rupter in HA... the draining skills are easy to rupt... --Kali Shin Shivara 03:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Yep. First you dshot esurge, then you magebane eburn, then you... somehow hit diversion... and... magically interrupt the other mesmer's shame/diversion chains, too. — Raine Valen User Raine R.gif 3:15, 5 Nov 2010 (UTC)
Ty, but I know how to go about it. However, it's not everyday you run into a pr0-am rupter. You seem like it, maybe you should go carry every team going up against the Mindwrack trend. Ardangoeswiki 06:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I think Raine was arguing for the point that mesmers are overpowered... King Neoterikos 07:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Raine, I believe it would be a good idea to install that sarcasmeter on your signature so people who don't know you make the mistake of thinking you give good advice. ~Shard User Shard Sig Icon.png 07:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

serious response - tell your monks to suck less. edenial was a big part of the game 4 years ago, people complaining about it now are just bad at hiding energy. the damage could come down a bit on these skills, but the energy burnt is fine. -Auron 09:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Do you guys actually play monk? or just theorical pros? imba meta is imba. ADD: the problem is Shatter Delusions not Energy Burn, imo--TeaCat._. User RedTeaCat TeaCat.jpg 19:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Actually, the reason energy denial is stronger now than it was before is because of power creep so they must heal more often and/or kill low-recharge spikes with ten energy skills. –~=Ϛρѧякγ AHHH! (τѧιк) ←♥– 19:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Serious response - You've never had a group where your monks mention anything about energy on vent/skype/whatever it is? Or do they just keep hush due to the fact that somebody on the team would complain and start raging on vent? Go figure. User Ardangoeswiki 19px-UserArdan sig.jpg Ardangoeswiki 02:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
So you are saying that E-denail is such a worse problem then back in the day where e-surge did -8 energy AoE and was carried with mind wrack and signet of weariness? You know, the meta where every monk had a maintained enchantment on themselves 24/7 having only 3 pips of regen? Spoiled I tell you, every single one of them complaining monks. (yes I monked then and do so now.) --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Deshiba (talk).
Yes, I am saying that. You think I didn't monk? The fact is they can drain more energy now and it takes more energy to keep your team alive because damage and pressure has power crept more than healing and protection. You know why we maintained enchantments all the time? Because we had the extra energy laying around to do so. –~=Ϛρѧякγ AHHH! (τѧιк) ←♥– 18:55, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
That ^. — Raine Valen User Raine R.gif 23:38, 21 Nov 2010 (UTC)