User talk:Mgrinshpon

From Guild Wars Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Please leave new messages at the bottom of the page.
Talk pages in order of where I'm most likely going to respond to fastest: PvXwiki, Guildwiki, Official Guild Wars Wiki
Current talk page • Archive

[edit] Laptop

Just saw your discussion on Izzy's talk page... fifty rebates? Can you still use your hand after all those?!

...Anyway, just curious, what sort of laptop did you manage to get with all those rebates? -- Jioruji Derako.> 03:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Acer deal that just ended, Compaq deal starting up. The Acers had a glitch where you could upgrade to Vista Ultimate for free due to a massive software glitch and came with a free printer. The Compaq has neither, but it's a free laptop! —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ〚₮/ḉ〛 03:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Nice... Athlon processors? I'm jealous! I've got a laptop that's probably a bit more powerful, but it's an Intel machine... I like the Athlon processor a lot better. Nice deal. -- Jioruji Derako.> 03:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

The Athlon is worse because a Pentium M, based off of the PIII architecture is more efficient than an Athlon laptop processor (Socket754). Socket 754 means it has no integrated memory controller and the processor architecture suffers greatly because of it. Also, I got the Acer. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ〚₮/ḉ〛 04:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

You lost me. I just use an Athlon 64 on my desktop gaming rig because it's generally a better choice purely for gaming, which is what I needed. The Intel chip on my laptop doesn't really make a difference other then personal preference, as the laptop is purely for my graphic design needs and general use. Still, dual-core Pentium is impressive, and a free laptop is nothing to scoff at. You can probably run Guild Wars off that machine... well, depending, I suppose. GW runs great on my laptop, but you still suffer from more lag issues then a desktop, not to mention using a touch-pad interface is a pain. -- Jioruji Derako.> 08:09, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Grinch is my wife. Discuss. Tab 12:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

So you're lesbians? (jk) -- Jioruji Derako.> 21:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your sig

I personally don't think that your signature follows our sig policy, although input from other users might be good to have. I am referring to the fact that no one seeing your sig for the first time can even guess what your user name is, although signatures are required to identify the user. It doesn't even have your full user name in it, it's missing the m, and the font is very very hard to read. -- (gem / talk) 00:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Has been discussed already. — Skakid9090 00:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I can see that. However, some users in that discussion directly said that they are not fully happy yet and I'm definitely not happy at all with this sig. --

(gem / talk) 01:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Your gem annoys me. Oh well. — Skakid9090 01:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Nothing in the policy even slightly hints that my sig would be violating it so live with it or change the policy. (or quit posting poor jokes if that's one) --

(gem / talk) 01:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Who cares what his name is the first time they see him, they'll recognize him from his sig and/or look at his userpage. His isn't long, it doesn't disrupt text flow, and I actually LIKE sigs like that since it's easily recognizable. — Skakid9090 01:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

I actually had no clue what Gem's username was the first time I saw his sig. :p --Edru viransu 02:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

As I keep bringing it up, if you're not happy with GWW:SIGN (but you still must adhere to it), please post a question or change proposal on that policy's talk page, rather than going back and forth about it here. -- ab.er.rant

02:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

I find it amusing that my sig annoys Gem so he bitches and whines about it but when Skakid brings up that Gem's sig is annoying, he instantly becomes defensive and paranoid. Very very amusing. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 02:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

I didn't see the 'defensive and paranoid' stuff. Lol at your interpretation of my words. You might not have noticed the discussions going elsewhere at the wiki at the same time Mgrinshpon, but Skakid was posting stupid jokes to multiple discussions and I was getting irritated by that, which explains the tone of my response to him. --

(gem / talk) 09:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

I think they're good jokes. — Skakid9090 22:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Thats cuz they are. And gr1nchpr0ns sig pwnzzzz Rawrawr Dinosaur 21:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

iawtc. Your signature is barely readable. Have you registered "User:—ǥrɩɳsɧ" like the policy requires? Please figure out a way that makes reading your signature easier. ~ dragon legacy 12:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Can you at least read my signature? --Edru viransu 12:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Should I lower my head a bit so kicking my face gets easier? ~ dragon legacy 12:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

You're a bigger troll than Readem. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 12:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

What? --Edru viransu 18:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

<reset> Srs lulz @ this whole conversation and Grinch's subsequent banner at the top of the page. I've personally always found it easy to read. — Hyperion // talk 01:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

That's because you're not a bumbling retard like the rest of these half-wits bitching about my sig. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 01:09, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

GWW:NPA GWW:NPA GWW:NPA GWW:NPA GWW:NPA GWW:NPA GWW:NPA GWW:NPA GWW:NPA GWW:NPA GWW:NPA — Skakid9090 01:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

They deserved to be NPA'd. Then fucking castrated. Every time I log onto this wretched fucking hellhole, "Oh look, new messages. ABOUT MY FUCKING AWESOME SIG WOOP-DE-FUCKING-DOO." Nope. Don't give a shit anymore about anyone who's bitched about my sig. They can go fuck themselves. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 01:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Disagreeing with policy does not warrant personal attacks. Take some time to cool down. - anja

19:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Gem r wanker. Discuss. Tab 20:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Lulz. I dunno about his part in this conversation, but in general I tend to disagree. — Hyperion // talk 20:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] [GWW]

It's We Fail at GWs [GWW]. Fix, please? --Edru viransu 05:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Also, we now have a guild page. --Edru viransu 05:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Hi!! spam spam :P 86.83.15.245 13:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi anon! How's it going? —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 13:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Im not an anon, actually i am 68.83 but i am too lazy to sign in:p 86.83.15.245 13:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

So how's it going stranger? —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 14:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm not a stranger?! I know you on guildwiki:P (does the name Sigm@ says anything?) 86.83.15.245 14:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh hai dere Sigma. How is it going? —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 14:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

I am blocked on guildwiki, and i was blocked on gww... it sucks:P 86.83.15.245 15:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Why's that? And there's always PvX. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 15:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm not allowed to redirect my userpage to wikipedia poo here.. 86.83.15.245 15:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

What!!? That's asinine. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 16:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Yay, still an hour blocked n guildwiki... What's wrong with saying stylva sucks at gww? 86.83.15.245 16:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Readem

About updates: Then why did they nerf TNtF :p 65.93.146.27 00:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

That's a PvE only skill, why the hell would PvP balance affect that in any way? List one real skill that has been nerfed in PvP because of abuse in PvE. -Auron 00:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

SoA — Skakid9090 01:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Still run on prot bars. Same with Spirit Bond. That meant it was overpowered in both. -Auron 01:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Intensity. _{lol completely offtopic and unrelated} — Skakid9090 01:05, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Prot Bond. I win. — Skuld 22:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

According to Izzy, that was due to a server crash caused by prot bond+energy on damage enchants+mind wrack. Look here. --Edru viransu 23:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

No UW :p — Skuld 23:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pokemon story

lol, was that real? --Lemming 02:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Pretty sure it was real, right grinch ;). Readem 02:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

As real as it gets. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 10:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Ya'll are so full of shit. -Auron 11:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

THe McyD's incident with the lady and the toddler...sad, but funny. Was that real or fake? Calor - talk 00:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

All my stories are as real as any story gets. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 11:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Next story: Your day in an executive boardroom wearing a Dragonball Z shirt and bright orange pants. Calor - talk 02:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

New story comes tommorow ;) —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 03:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Admins here and at GW

Your accusations here are as unsourced as they are wrong. You clearly have not looked at all the problems that GW had with admins. I do still remember the endless whining about noone being able to reign in trolling on the build pages, as I do the deletion of said section. How did the GW system prove to be superior there? Not at all. You also fail to realise that we do have working policies in place: You can be warned and banned for calling others "5 year old children" or calling the average contributer "retard". The only reason why you are not is because our current sysops chose not to enforce that policy with a ban yet. --Xeeron 14:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

I rest my case as proven by me not being banned. Wikis are not democracies, they are dictatorships, ruled by the select few who aren't half-wits. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 20:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

The reason you are not banned is the application of the rules, not the rules. You respond by saying that this proves GW's rules are better. Does not prove anything to me. --Xeeron 21:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] wuts up on pvx

woa the website doesnt exist or something whenever i try to get on i am blocked on unoficial wiki so im contacting u here and asking wtf's up with pvx?--Vørråx 20:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Idiots keep editing the main page templates and resetting the cache. — Skakid HoHoHo 20:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

well someone should protect it...--Vørråx 20:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

It's lagging too much to protect it — Skakid HoHoHo 20:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NPA

Please do not insult felow users as you did in the summary of an edit on Disease - http://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=Disease&diff=prev&oldid=564693 -- br12 • (talk) • 18:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not misspell fellow. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 22:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zhed + Gaile = 2 week block

I'll assume that was your way of saying "I've given up on this wiki as I think it's unfixable." If I'm right, then consider coming to the new Guild Wars 2 wiki and help us get it off to a good start. —Tanaric 06:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Good imagination, but horribly inappropriate.

Devi Talk 07:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

He didn't make it up, its copypasta stuffs going around. See here for the first place I know it was posted at. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 08:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Scourge asked me on IRC to vandalize his page. I gladly obliged (Mgrinshpon from a proxy) 128.197.11.30 12:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Considering the nature of the material you used to oblige, I'm upholding the block. —Tanaric 19:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Meh, you're a negative nancy. It's just good reading is all. That said, I'll really give it a shot on GW2W. 88.191.25.27 20:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Good to hear. Now stop posting here, I'm getting tired of banning your anon accounts. :P —Tanaric 00:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

The party never ends! 85.214.73.63 01:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

See [1] for my first turning of the new leaf. 212.42.236.140 01:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 6-27 >8

Bleh. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 17:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Proxy Use

Please don't use proxy servers to sidestep a ban. They are used to positive purposes on the wiki and obvious abuse like this only adds fuel to the lobby trying to have proxy servers banned. I am not saying your use of proxy servers is with the intention to do harm, but it is undeniably provocative. I would like you to show that lobby that they are wrong and there is no need to ban proxy servers. 58.110.142.135 05:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

How have proxies been used for "positive purposes on the wiki"? All the users I've seen using proxies have been making less than constructive edits to the wiki... -- scourge 08:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Positive use eh? Indeed. Why don't you just make sockpuppet accounts? It's no more shady than using proxies, and since your logic basically states the ends justify the means, it's a pretty win-win solution to your problem. -Auron 08:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] kris pwned

I wouldn't feel right just giving it away, but do a search for Racthoh. -Auron 12:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brother Cadfael

ure awesome at being awesome --Cursed Angel 02:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I figured someone had to take the initiative. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş

03:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Man I lolled so hard at these sick comments. Dark Morphon(contribs) 17:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Mgrinshpon/Breaking News

I've removed your little story from that page - it doesn't belong on the wiki and I don't expect it to be put back. Please don't put anything similar on that page, nor revert back to that edition. -- Brains12 \ Talk 23:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

the party never ends! :D --Cursed Angel

01:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

its still pretty X-rated nearer to the bottom. Personally, I'd like to see this removed.

Wandering Traveler 19:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

It's such an awesome page though :( -- Mini Me

19:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you to the one that put up the deletion tag.

Wandering Traveler 19:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) (Edit conflict) Wandering Traveler is right, this page needs to be removed very soon. Your lucky the admins are softies, Mgrinshpon. --Shadowphoenix Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg 19:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Or he could put less sexually explicit on it, like before. But I guess he won't :p -- Mini Me

19:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

IM PRTY SEXUALLY ESPLSIT BRO JUS SHAAKIN DEM ERFS WIF DA UGH UGH ND DEN GAIA SED R U CHEETN ON ME ND IM LIEK NO WAI BRO ND SHES LIEK KK ND DEN I STPPD CUZ GAIA CN GT PRTTY ANGREE ND SHT BUT BASIKLEE JUS CALL ME FR ERF SHAAKIN TIEM ND I SHAAK U LIEK U NVR IMGNE KK DUUD? —̵ERF SHAКUUЯ 01:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

....no comment. give me an hour to translate that as it is....anyways, why has this still not being deleted? its back up....I don't quite get the problem here. even on a userpage, sexual references like this are completely and totally unacceptable. with all due respect, screw any policy, perhaps its not on there. we just have to use common sense. do we have sexual themes in the GWW? no. should there be? common sense should tell you no. this is a site for GW fans, not perverts. I'm voting for a general, if not speedy deletion of this. it may not fit in any deletion policy from what I see, but it still needs to be gone.

Wandering Traveler 14:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

QQ --71.229.204.25 21:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

QQ urself, i agree with traveler, this wiki should not have content like that or anything else. This is GW, not a commitee of "mass-debators" if you get my point. I vote fore deletion--

Raph Talky 02:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] IS THIS THE 17th CENTURY?

I DONT THINK SO. HAI GREENCH> 76.90.73.121 22:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

ME NEITHER!--Shadowsin 03:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] wuts trolin m8?

Here's the deal, men. I keep my breaking news (with a disclaimer up top) with whatever text I want and I won't troll/evade bans/etc except to update that text. Everyone wins! Grinch Wars Wiki 02:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

No. Please end this. —Tanaric 02:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] SHINZO

SHINZO FOR BCRAT! --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:12.175.230.57 (talk).

[edit] Again?!

....We went through this already a month ago. Please dont' post explicit stories like this on the wiki. I'm not sure how much more blunt I can be. -- Wandering Traveler 00:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

In simple terms, this is a request to remove the story. Otherwise you will get blocked. Please do so quickly. --

Wandering Traveler 01:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, the story at User:Mgrinshpon/Breaking News is in violation of Guild Wars Wiki:User pages, please remove it. -- Gordon Ecker 01:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

i wuv you grinchydiddles. 69.248.232.88 03:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I wuv me to. And you too. I wuv eveweywun. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş

03:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

WT, stop trolling his page then, you are also not an admin, backseat sysoping is also against the rules I'm sure. Gordon, dont read it. Grinsh, that ones not very funny :(. still wuv you tho <3 --Shadowsin 07:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Your "Breaking News" page has been deleted. If you recreate it or anything in a similar vein, it will be deleted and you're getting blocked again. - Tanetris 08:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] kk

u = fail, kk? Droks 19:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

That seems to be the general concensus around here, doesn't it? —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş

01:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, if we all let PvX noobs (Not to say noobs which are inherent to PvX, but noobs even in the PvX system) get to us, I'd be in the psych ward, miles away from a computer with internet. And I don't even have a PvX account. --Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 01:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

are you referring to droks or grinsh?--Raph Talky 01:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Who's to say? :) But no, at that point, I was referring to Droks. However, in the light of this recent block, I'm not too sure who it would be if I were to phrase that again. I really can't believe he remade that page. --Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 17:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Cause it was really horrible for him to do so, and it was really offensive, and he's really forcing everyone to read it. God damn, hit the unwatch button and clean out your - -- Armond Warblade

17:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Clean out my...cookie jar? Also, what was with you recreating the /Breaking News page? Tell me it's a joke. Or is GWW under attack by the worst hacker to ever ~~grace~~ be on the internet? Worst as in the superlative for terrible. Banal. Below average. This is, of course, in respect to the prospective hacker, and not meant towards Grinsh. --Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 17:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

If making the page is such a fucking horrible offense I ought to be banned by now. People like you and Tanetris don't seem capable of comprehending the idea that the content, and not the page name, is what's in debate. -- Armond Warblade

17:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Just being jocular, my friend. I really just wanted to do that "worst hacker" bit. Is this a prod in the same vein as this bit, or am I just the fool in another joke? Also, I think recreating the page is a good way to head off grinsh from getting more fun out of recreating it again. "The best way to make a graffiti artist cry is to paint the building he's heading off to." - Oscar Wilde* Also? I got lumped together with an admin. Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! *Not really--Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 17:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Quit while you're behind. Before you make yourself look like more of a retard. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş

12:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

How are the children grinch? --Readem 14:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

They're not bad. I've had quite a few with my crazy sexcapades. And many of them keep getting blocked just because they look like they're my socks. For shame. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş

12:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)