Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/DominatorMatrix/Archive2

Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions.

RFA Archive

DominatorMatrix

This request is for the sysophood of DominatorMatrix (talk • contribs • logs • block log).
Created by Dominator Matrix 03:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC).

Status

Failed 07:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Candidate statement

Its officially been a half year (6 months) since my last RFA. Since then I think I am a better candidate for a sysop. I am more able to control my emotions, and stay level headed.

This time around I think I would be able to be a great sysop since I have been active for a very long time on this wiki. With my experience I know the ins and outs of the wiki. So I am able to help people more, and fix the wiki (to some extent).

Though I am currently limited in my effectiveness on this wiki. I cannot block vandals, so I have to go the slow route of reporting it. Being able to delete images/pages will also help me be more effective on managing this wiki.

Hopefully my past experiences can show that I am a great candidate for being a sysop. Although there is not much going on the wiki currently, that could always change. I have waiting quite a long time since my last RFA to sharpen my skills, and I hope that is displayed.

Thank you, and keep it constructive. Dominator Matrix 03:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Support

1. Support. I feel that he has matured a great deal and would now make a good sysop. Lord Belar 03:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
2. Support. Dom's been around for a while, and he's greatly improved on how he handles situations. I think he'd make a fine sysop. -- Wandering Traveler 05:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
3. Support. I think Dom would do fine as a sysop. -- Wyn 02:13, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Same as last time, not much has changed imo. --Shadowphoenix 03:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
2. wat --78.82.74.227 12:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Sorry I don't know you to trust you enough, Your contribs are good, but I only know you from talk pages and stuff, but since you're well contributed I'm going neutral .-- Yo Jm 16:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
2. Can't make a decision, so neutral it is. good luck. --Lemming 02:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
3. I haven't seen enough of you to make a proper decision. That which I have seen was positive, so good luck. — Why 09:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
4. As the "average-joe wiki'er", I've not seen enough contributions, that said, you could be doing more background work than I can see. I'm staying neutral but good luck nonetheless!--Alex Eternal 19:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
5. Meh. -Auron 01:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
6. I'm kind of leaning negative, but that's more of a gut reaction on half remembered incidents so I was just not going to vote. Neutral will do. Misery 09:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)