Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Tanetris
Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions. |
Tanetris[edit]
This request is for the sysophood of User:Tanetris (talk • contribs).
Nominated by User:Tanaric, page created by -- ab.er.rant 01:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Candidate statement[edit]
If Tanaric nominates me, who am I to refuse? I'd imagine more active users than not know me by now, but for those who don't, I've been in the past two bcrat elections, so you can see my candidate statements there and the discussions on the associated talk pages. Obviously you can take a look through my contribs to see my edits. I patrol Recentchanges fairly regularly and look in on anything that catches my attention, even if I don't usually stick my nose in. As I've recently said on Tanaric's reconfirmation (support vote #18), I do believe in sysop discretion, but I also believe that discretion should be exercised carefully. That's all I can think of, so vote away. - Tanetris 03:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Status[edit]
Accepted 13:35, 9 January 2008
Support[edit]
- Strong Support: Tanetris is full of win! I feel that he would make an excellent SysOp given the chance. -- scourge 04:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong support. Level-headed, intelligent, funny... if this weren't the Internet and I not a staunch heterosexual, I'd ask him out on a date. —Tanaric 08:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Tanetris is a good choice! poke | talk 11:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support. - anja 11:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Tanetris' adminship gives me the warm fuzzies. - HeWhoIsPale 14:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support. -- Brains12 • Talk • 14:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Nothing against, and I think he gives some good points. Coran Ironclaw 22:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Tanaric's reasons....and nice side comment :p Calor (t) 01:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support Can think and reason. I trust him to use his discretion for the betterment of the wiki. -Auron 13:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose[edit]
- Hell No --Cursed Angel 22:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Neutral[edit]
- I am not entirely certain that I would support Tanetris becoming a sysop. I don't really have enough experience with him to know whether he'd be a good sysop. However, I am leaning toward support, simply because I trust Tanaric's judgement. --— Edru/QQ 05:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'd prefer it if Tanetris was more active here. — ク Eloc 貢 22:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)