Talk:Imbawar
We're having some warrior-addicted authors here.[edit]
"It adds to the universal Warrior which can farm, run, vanquish and now be able to support members!" —ZerphaThe Improver 17:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- "This tactic is often utilized in order to properly vanquish areas...". Darn, guess I've been doing those Vanquishes all wrong it seems. -- Arduin 13:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. Changed it to read "efficiently".69.249.223.63 03:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Clean up[edit]
I have never run an Imbawar before, so someone that has should give my clean up a look through. --Riddle 05:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's a staple for Mallyx; it is run. I find the name here a misnomer though. It's certainly not the proper term (I don't believe there is one), but the simple premise is a melee character, be it Warrior, Assassin, Dervish, or sometimes another Paragon, rapidly attacking as to maintain "SY!" -- Oiseau | 15:47, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
I have never, ever used this term[edit]
Warriors, Dervishes, Assassins, Barrage Rangers as well as Imbagons can keep up SY. The Imbagon is a specific build to do so. Imbawar is a term I've never seen used and IMO this page is pointless as hell. 59.100.118.70 07:39, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's not that common anymore, but it used to be. ThrainFile:User Thrain Sig.pngcontribs 07:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Should be deleted. Retarded term for retarded wammos that cry that their class is completely useless. Sin can keep up SY! better than that sh!t and still got more armor due to crit agi. And such stupis wammo, imbagon wannabe can't even use TNTF coz it lasts like 4 seconds. Really imba. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:79.188.206.150 (talk).
Battle Behavior[edit]
Too redundant, is it worth keeping that section if the page is cleaned?--AP-DarkPortal 15:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Not worth keeping the page, never heard of this term in 5 yrs. --File:User Chieftain Alex Chieftain Signature.pngChieftain Alex 18:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- [1] -- Oiseau | 19:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see "imba" anywhere on that page. Generally I hear it refered to as a SY war or a DSlash war. --JonTheMon 19:24, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- I've already said on this page that the term is unfamiliar to me, but the concept is the same. -- Oiseau | 19:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Not in my life have i heard of a melle imbawar. This is what i use to imbawar, If anything. --Neil • 20:10, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- I've already said on this page that the term is unfamiliar to me, but the concept is the same. -- Oiseau | 19:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see "imba" anywhere on that page. Generally I hear it refered to as a SY war or a DSlash war. --JonTheMon 19:24, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- [1] -- Oiseau | 19:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Deletion[edit]
I vote for deletion. The article is over a year old, and this term simple hasn't caught on. The term isn't used, the build isn't a staple or meta build. When all is said and done, this build simply doesn't have the impact that warrants an article.109.131.24.63 17:34, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- agree, imbawars aren't imba, they just dont bring the defense capabilities of a paragon 24.130.140.36 17:50, 29 July 2011 (UTC)