Talk:Rollo Lowlo

This name isn't for real, is it? Oh my... it is. Where has it gone? >_> Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 01:05, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

wow, you had to expect something like this. now it's just a joke --adrin 01:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Wait.....the whole contest wasn't a joke? Karate Jesus 01:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

My guild hall is FULL of new henchmen heroes...-- anguard 01:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Fixed that for you. Karate Jesus 01:18, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Motoko got one. jesus christ. i guess you just have to fail majorly hard to get one --adrin 01:18, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

If that was the case, surely half the heroes would be named after you? WAKAKAKAKAKAKA Gladiator Motoko 13:54, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

If only it were possible to miss more interrupts than the idiot in this video. --98.150.161.251 14:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't really care about who is being bad or not, but counting the amount of bull's and interrupts a warrior lands in high level GvG matches is a very inaccurate measure of a warrior's skill. You have to remember that the warrior's opponents are experienced players who are equally, or at the least comparably capable of NOT eating bulls and casting irregularly to avoid prediction interrupts. Pika Fan 17:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Except in that match, where they weren't facing experienced players, and he still missed most of his bulls and interrupts. At first, I wondered why there was even a dchop counter, then it got to the end and he missed 85% of them, and I understood. That's just bad warrioring. --98.150.161.251 04:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

I am a whoru(and pretty bad) monk, and top warriors like saria still miss bulls and interrupts on a regular basis on me, but I don't think they are bad. Perhaps dchopping was lacking, but certainly not bullsing. When we were ATing(our guild rating was at just above 1k at that time), we faced up against top guilds like Battle Bakery and yumy, our monks did fine against bulls and dchop. Pika Fan 04:40, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

A little tip on judging the effectiveness of dchop's: When watching a warrior use it, if he uses it after knocking down a character, he is doing it correctly. This provides essentially a quarterknock but more of a quartershut down. Regardless if it hits or not, he is using it correctly. If he uses it on a spike after executioners, he is using it correctly. The point of it is to widen the time of effectiveness where the target cannot cast anything to remedy the situation. Gladiator Motoko 06:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I approve of this henchman hero. --Cursed Angel 01:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC) 01:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

GW is a joke.--98.238.169.189 04:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

I want a TexMod thing to change his name to Rolol Lololol.--neshot 21:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

We fought this guy last night, but he was all polygons. Just white lines w/o his armor or anything. It was fucked up ~ Chao 21:33, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Okay, so it's not just me. I'm going to get a screenshot of him anywaym but it looks kinda fucked.-- anguard 15:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

use

but dem will really use make haste and song of conc properly? xD--83.55.90.233 09:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

no. Brandnew. 18:01, 6 November 2009 (UTC)